First insider trading loss for Manhattan U.S. attorney Preet Bharara’s
By Sital S. Patel
Raj Rajaratnam’s brother ends the winning streak of insider trading cases gone after by Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s.
After just one day of deliberations, a jury on Tuesday found Rengan Rajaratnam not guilty of a single charge of conspiracy to commit insider trading.

Rengan Rajaratnam (center L) embraces his lawyer Daniel Gitner as they exit the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Lower Manhattan July 8, 2014.
Credit: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
The verdict is a blow for Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s office, who has produced 85 convictions by trial or guilty pleas to insider trading. Rengan’s verdict makes it the first insider trading loss for Bharara.
“This will temper the office in deciding what cases would be prosecuted,” said Richard Holwell, partner at law firm Holwell Shuster & Goldberg and former federal judge presiding over the insider trading trial of Rengan’s older brother Raj Rajaratnan.
They will obviously be careful of what they indict in the future but this won’t slow down the office, he added.
Raj Rajaratnam is currently serving 11 years in prison of multiple counts insider trading charges. Rengan was accused of working with his brother and using confidential information to make trades for a profit.
“This defense verdict sends a powerful message that juries are willing and able to reach a not-guilty verdict if they don’t believe the government has presented enough evidence to convict,” says White & Case Partner and former SEC Trial Attorney Greg Little.
There were initially six counts of fraud against the 43-year-old hedge fund manager, but five of the charges were ultimately dropped after the judge in the case determined there is not enough evidence that he made the illegal trades.
Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of Federal District Court dropped two charges during the trial. At one point, the judge told prosecutors working in Bharara’s office that some of the legal arguments in the case “don’t make any sense at all.”
“While we are disappointed with the verdict on the sole count that the jury was permitted to consider, we respect the jury trial system whatever the outcome, and we thank the jury for their service,” said Bharara in a statement after the verdict.
“It’s very unusual to drop charges in the middle of a trial,” said Holwell. “A judge would not typical do that unless he thought the case was lacking.”
Wires tapes were played during the trial of Rengan speaking with his older brother that didn’t sound great, but were vague, say legal experts. Rengan’s trial lawyer Daniel Gitner argued there is no evidence that his client knew who his brother’s sources were using inside information.
“No-one wants to see a winning streak end, but I always got the feeling this was a tag-along case,” said Peter Henning, Professor of Law at Wayne State University Law School. “The U.S. Attorney’s office thought they had to bring it.” (Courtesy: Marketwatch)
Report by Associated Press:
Jury in NY Acquits Ex-Hedge Fund Founder’s Brother
By Larry Neumeister
NEW YORK — The brother of an imprisoned ex-billionaire hedge fund founder was acquitted of conspiracy on Tuesday, handing Manhattan prosecutors their first loss after dozens of insider trading convictions in prosecutions that relied heavily on wiretaps and the testimony of those who pleaded guilty.
After the verdict was announced, Rengan Rajaratnam hugged attorneys before jurors even left the room. The smiling 43-year-old defendant left the courthouse without commenting. He still faces civil charges from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Today is the day Rengan has been waiting for,” said his lawyer, Daniel Gitner. “We thank the jury for its careful attention. Rengan looks forward to getting on with his life.”
Federal Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald had dismissed the two most serious charges last week, and prosecutors had withdrawn four other charges when the judge raised questions about them in a written opinion.
In a statement, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said his office was “disappointed with the verdict on the sole count that the jury was permitted to consider.”
The defendant’s brother, Raj Rajaratnam — founder of the Galleon Group of hedge funds — is serving an 11-year sentence after the government said he earned up to $75 million illegally by trading on secrets provided by corrupt employees of public companies and a network of analysts and portfolio managers who also obtained inside information.
Two dozen other defendants have pleaded guilty or were convicted in the case. In all, prosecutors have obtained guilty pleas or jury verdicts against 81 individuals in insider trading cases in the last six years.
The probe, initially focused on hedge fund portfolio managers, analysts and employees of public companies, eventually was extended to include research professionals at networking companies.
Prosecutors had alleged that Rengan Rajaratnam joined his brother to cheat in the stock market in 2008 on the securities of two technology companies.
Gitner said in closing arguments Monday that the prosecution had “failed on every score” to prove its case.
He told jurors his client, who was born in Sri Lanka and living in Brazil when he learned of the charges, had immediately announced: “I am innocent. This is about my brother, not me. I want to go back. I want to clear my name.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Frey urged jurors in his closings to use common sense and review trading records.
The charge against Rengan Rajaratnam was an extension of charges in a prosecution in which the government touted its novel use of wiretaps to catch Wall Street professionals acting illegally.
Former federal Judge Richard J. Holwell, who presided over Raj Rajaratnam’s trial, said the acquittal was not a profound loss for the government, given its 81 victories before a defeat.
“It probably indicates that the government just pushed too far with too little,” said Holwell, who left the bench in 2012 to work in private practice.
He said prosecutors may have done Rengan Rajaratnam a favor by not indicting him with his brother.
“There’s always some prejudice that arises by being tried with a guiltier co-defendant. It just rubs off on you,” Holwell said. (Courtesy: AP)

