Mahinda Rajapaksa Walks Out While MP’s Aligned to Him Try To Block Voting But No Confidence Motion Passed with 122 out of 225 Parliamentarians Voting in Favour.

By Dharisha Bastians and Jeffrey Gettleman

A majority of Sri Lankan lawmakers voted Wednesday (14) morning to remove Mahinda Rajapaksa as prime minister, saying that his appointment last month was illegal.

Mr. Rajapaksa is considered the strongman of Sri Lankan politics, a wealthy, powerful former president who has been accused of grave human rights abuses. The country has been tied in knots since late last month when President Maithripala Sirisena abruptly fired the previous prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and appointed Mr. Rajapaksa to the post.

It was a rambunctious, unruly few hours in Parliament this morning.

Lawmakers allied with Mr. Wickremesinghe walked into the chamber wearing black sashes that read “For democracy.’’ The gallery was packed with journalists, diplomats and everyday citizens. Lawmakers allied with Mr. Rajapaksa did whatever they could to block a vote of no confidence. Some yelled, while others tried to grab the ceremonial mace, the parliamentary symbol of power. Some even called the speaker of Parliament a “mad fool.”

But a majority of lawmakers were determined to hold the vote. Mr. Rajapaksa then walked out. When the ayes were counted, 122 out of 225 said they wanted Mr. Rajapaksa gone.

Continue reading ‘Mahinda Rajapaksa Walks Out While MP’s Aligned to Him Try To Block Voting But No Confidence Motion Passed with 122 out of 225 Parliamentarians Voting in Favour.’ »

No Confidence Motion Against Mahinda Rajapaksa Passed by a Voice Vote Despite Boisterous Attempts by UPFA MP’s to Scuttle it,But President Sirisena Refuses to Accept NCM.

By Chathuri Dissanayake and Ashwin Hemmathagama

Amidst scenes of pandemonium, a no confidence motion against Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and his Government was rushed through Parliament last morning, with several political parties jointly supporting the motion.

A motion was passed with a voice vote with Speaker Karu Jayasuriya announcing that the vote carried in favour of the “ayes” as his voice became almost inaudible with members of the UPFA hurling abuse at the Chair.

The Serjeant-at-Arms moved the Mace out of its bracket and held it in his arms and stood close to the Speaker’s chair as the situation became more boisterous.

United National Party Parliamentarians attended the session which convened yesterday at 10 a.m. following the Supreme Court’s interim order to suspend the gazette notice dissolving Parliament wearing black sashes printed with ‘For Democracy’ in all three languages around their necks, hoping to see an end to the ongoing constitutional crisis.

Adding to the drama of the day was the crossover by five MPs, all to the UNP camp. Three of the MPs – A.H.M. Fowzie, Manusha Nanayakkara and Piyasena Gamage – crossed over while the House was in session while Suresh Vadivel and Wasantha Senanayake too pledged support to the side later in the day.

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya struggled to maintain order in the House as Rajapaksa camp resorted to yelling in protest when TNA Parliamentarian M. A. Sumanthiran moved a motion to seek approval of the House to suspend Standing Orders of Parliament. A division was moved for suspending the Standing Orders, which received House approval despite the disturbances from the UPFA Joint Opposition.

Continue reading ‘No Confidence Motion Against Mahinda Rajapaksa Passed by a Voice Vote Despite Boisterous Attempts by UPFA MP’s to Scuttle it,But President Sirisena Refuses to Accept NCM.’ »

Escalation of Current Political Crisis May Provide President Sirisena an Excuse to Declare Emergency and Call Out the Armed Services to Maintain Law and Order.

by Prof S W R de A Samarasinghe

On November 13 evening, the third branch of government, the Judiciary in the form of the Supreme Court, dealt a blow for Sri Lanka’s fragile democracy when it issued a stay order on dissolving Parliament, effective until December 07. The Election Commission will suspend all action to hold parliamentary elections on January 5. In doing so the Supreme Court signalled the importance of constituitonal governance that puts the interest of the country before partisan poltical interests. In effect this ruling also allows the Speaker to recall Parliament.

“Me First”

In sharp contrast, the President, who is the head of the executive branch, has been acting in the last two weeks with impunity, largely in his own self-interest. The legislative branch (parliament) has become an auction house where bribery reigns, cabinet office is made available as a bribe for partisan behaviour and self comes before country for very many MPs.

Government in limbo

The decision of the Supreme Court is not the end of the threat that has been posed to Sri Lanka’s democracy but may well be the beginning of a more perilous course. The absurd situation of two individuals claiming to be prime minister remains unresolved at the time of this writing. The Supreme Court will deliver its final verdict only on December 06th. The general administration of the country remains at least semi-paralyzed with no clear political leadership at the top.

Power struggle

These constituitonal battles are being fought not for the sake of constituitonal propriety but for power. From that perspective the key parties in the fight have seen their prospects change dramatically since Sirisena sacked Wickremesinghe on October 26.

Continue reading ‘Escalation of Current Political Crisis May Provide President Sirisena an Excuse to Declare Emergency and Call Out the Armed Services to Maintain Law and Order.’ »

Battle Between the Sri Lankan President and Parliament Takes Fresh Twist With Sirisena Faulting Speaker Jayasuriya’s Conduct and Rejecting Provisions of No Confidence Motion Passed with 122 Votes.

A battle between Sri Lanka’s Parliament and President Maithripala Sirisena took a new turn finding fault with a no-confidence motion passed against Mahinda Rajapaksa who was controversially appointed as Prime Minister, triggering a political crisis in the island.

President Sirsena replying a letter by Speaker Karu Jayasuriya earlier in the day, President Sirisena said he rejected part of the motion which said that gazette notices issued by him relating to appointing Rajapaksa as Prime Minister and sacking Ranil Wickremesinghe was unconstitutional.

The Speaker in a statement said he forwarded the no confidence motion passed against Rajapaksa and also a letter signed by 122 legislators of the 225 member assembly against Rajapaksa.

Continue reading ‘Battle Between the Sri Lankan President and Parliament Takes Fresh Twist With Sirisena Faulting Speaker Jayasuriya’s Conduct and Rejecting Provisions of No Confidence Motion Passed with 122 Votes.’ »

Sri Lankan Political Crisis Escalates Further With Two Different Governments Under Prime Ministers Ranil Wickremesinghe and Mahinda Rajapaksa Claiming Legitimacy.

Sri Lanka’s political crisis heightened further on Wednesday when ousted Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and former president Mahinda Rajapakse both claimed they would continue in government following a heated debate in Parliament earlier in the day.

Hours after a no confidence motion was submitted on the floor of Parliament against new Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse and his government, ousted Prime Minister Wickremesinghe said the motion had been passed through a ‘voice vote’ with a majority of legislators voting for it.

He then told journalists in a media briefing from the Parliamentary complex that 122 legislators in the 225 member Parliament had signed a motion favoring the no confidence motion and it was handed to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya.

Continue reading ‘Sri Lankan Political Crisis Escalates Further With Two Different Governments Under Prime Ministers Ranil Wickremesinghe and Mahinda Rajapaksa Claiming Legitimacy.’ »

Prorogued Sri Lankan Parliament is Re -convened on Nov 14 and Adjourned Until Nov 15 by Speaker Karu After No Confidence Motion is Passed Against Purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Sri Lanka’s Parliament has been adjourned till 10.00 am tomorrow (15) by Speaker Karu Jayasuriya after amid a tense situation, after the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna moved a motion of no confidence, legislators said.

Sri Lanka’s speakers had accepted that a majority of members supported a motion of no confidence against Mahinda Rajapaksa’s administration, legislators who came out of the chamber told reporters.

UNP’s Sajith Premadasa told reporters that legislators with Mahinda Rajapaksa had attempted to distrupt proceedings, but democracy had prevailed.

Continue reading ‘Prorogued Sri Lankan Parliament is Re -convened on Nov 14 and Adjourned Until Nov 15 by Speaker Karu After No Confidence Motion is Passed Against Purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.’ »

Ranil Wickremesinghe Confirms to Media that 122 MP’s Have Informed Speaker They Voted In Favour of No Confidence Motion Against Mahinda Rajapaksa

UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe said voice vote was taken by the Speaker on the No Confidence Motion submitted in Parliament against the Government and that 122 MPs informed the Speaker that they voted in favour of it.

He told media that the NCM passed in Parliament with a majority could not be challenged and added that if anyone wanted to challenge the Speaker’s decision, they could move a resolution challenging his decision tomorrow.

Continue reading ‘Ranil Wickremesinghe Confirms to Media that 122 MP’s Have Informed Speaker They Voted In Favour of No Confidence Motion Against Mahinda Rajapaksa’ »

Mahinda Camp MP’s AHM Fowzie, Piyasena Gamage , Manusha Nanayakkara,Wasantha Senanayake and Vadivel Suresh Turn Against Mahinda Rajapaksa by Voting for No Confidence Motion Against Him.

The United National Party confirmed that 122 MPs have signed the No Confidence Motion against new Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and his purposed government.

Apart from 102 MPs representing the UNP, the TNA, the JVP and several MPs who initially supported Sirisea-Rajapaksa alliance, namely Manusha Nanayakkara, Wasantha Senanayake, Vadiwel Suresh, Piyasena Gamage and A.H.M. Fowzie also supported the NCM against Rajapaksa.

Continue reading ‘Mahinda Camp MP’s AHM Fowzie, Piyasena Gamage , Manusha Nanayakkara,Wasantha Senanayake and Vadivel Suresh Turn Against Mahinda Rajapaksa by Voting for No Confidence Motion Against Him.’ »

122 Out of 225 MP’s Sign No Confidence Motion Against Mahinda Rajapaksa Who Walks Out of Chamber Suddenly Causing an Uproar in House

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya has issued a statement saying the no-confidence motion against former President Mahinda Rajapaksa was taken up in the house.

The Speaker said 122 MPs had signed the no-confidence motion.

The motion will be sent to President Maithripala Sirisena for him to take necessary action.

The United National Party (UNP) earlier confirmed that 122 MPs signed the No Confidence Motion although MPs of the UPFA denied the fact.

Continue reading ‘122 Out of 225 MP’s Sign No Confidence Motion Against Mahinda Rajapaksa Who Walks Out of Chamber Suddenly Causing an Uproar in House’ »

3 Judge Bench Comprising Chief Justice Perera and Justices Prasanna and Priyantha Jayawardana in Landmark Ruling Issues Stay Order Until December 7th on President Sirisena’s Gazette Dissolving Parliament .

By Chathuri Dissanayake

Emotions ran high as the three-judge bench ofthe Supreme Court yesterday delivered a landmark decision, issuing a stay order on the gazette dissolving Parliament issued by President Maithripala Sirisena until 7 December.

The decision, delivered at around 5.45p.m. in the evening after a gruelling 45 minutes of uncertainty, was heard in pin-drop silence with lawyers, politicians and journalists alike straining to hear every word uttered by Chief Justice Nalin Perera.

The three-judge bench, led by the Chief Justice, comprising justices Prasanna Jayawardane and Priyantha Jayawardane, yesterday heard out lawyers for the second day, only breaking at 3.00 p.m. before a decision was delivered.

Visibly moved by the victory, Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran hailed the order as “the most important decision the Supreme Court has delivered in its history”.

The Parliamentarian, who appeared for Petitioner Champika Fernando, confidently said that Parliament’s business could now go on as the gazette dissolving Parliament had been suspended and the previous gazette that the President issued reconvening Parliament was now active.

“Parliament will meet tomorrow at 10.00 a.m.,” a confident Sumanthiran told Daily FT. The Speaker’s office later confirmed Parliament would reconvene today at 10.00 a.m., preceded by a party leaders’ meeting at 8.00 a.m.

Continue reading ‘3 Judge Bench Comprising Chief Justice Perera and Justices Prasanna and Priyantha Jayawardana in Landmark Ruling Issues Stay Order Until December 7th on President Sirisena’s Gazette Dissolving Parliament .’ »

Mahinda Rajapaksa and Maithripala Sirisena to Form New Alliance Named ” Podujana Nidhahas Peramuna” to Contest Elections Scheduled for Jan 5th 2019.

President Maithripala Sirisena and newly-appointed Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa have arrived at an understanding to contest the Parliamentary election as a common alliance under the name “Nidahas Podujana Peramuna.”

The discussion between the two leaders had taken place last night, a day after Rajapaksa and a host MPs relinquished their SLFP membership and joined the Sri Lanka Podujana Party.

Continue reading ‘Mahinda Rajapaksa and Maithripala Sirisena to Form New Alliance Named ” Podujana Nidhahas Peramuna” to Contest Elections Scheduled for Jan 5th 2019.’ »

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya to Convene Parliament at 10 am On Wednesday Nov 14th Preceded by Party Leaders Meeting at 8.30 am In the Parliamentary Complex.

Sri Lanka’s Speaker, Karu Jayasuriya has asked members to convene to determine the legitimacy of a government and asked the public and officials to abide by the decisions of court and parliament after courts suspended a sacking of the Parliament by President Maithripala Sirisena.

“After several days of political uncertainty, the public can take pride in our judiciary, which has risen to the occasion and treated this matter of grave national importance with due urgency and deliberation,” Speaker Jayasuriya said in a statement.

“Parliament must now perform its role by allowing the elected representatives of the people to reach a determination on the legitimacy of their government.

“I urge the public to find comfort in the day’s events and to share my confidence in our elected representatives.

:It is important that the general public and especially persons in positions of responsibility conduct themselves in a calm and dignified manner in order to avoid unnecessary provocation and instability.

Continue reading ‘Speaker Karu Jayasuriya to Convene Parliament at 10 am On Wednesday Nov 14th Preceded by Party Leaders Meeting at 8.30 am In the Parliamentary Complex.’ »

Prominent Buddhist Monk Organizations “National Bhikku Forum ” and ” Pevidi Handa” Want President Sirisena To Hold a Referendum to Obtain the Peoples Will Over Parliament Dissolution Issue.

Two prominent Bhikkhu organisations yesterday urged President Maithripala Sirisena to hold a referendum immediately to let the people decide whether they approved of the dissolution of Parliament.

Addressing a press conference organized by the Pevidi Handa in Colombo, Ven. Murutththettuwe Ananda Thera said that there were sinister forces in overdrive to deprive the people of the victory they had achieved.

Continue reading ‘Prominent Buddhist Monk Organizations “National Bhikku Forum ” and ” Pevidi Handa” Want President Sirisena To Hold a Referendum to Obtain the Peoples Will Over Parliament Dissolution Issue.’ »

Nimal Siripala de Silva Says Request Will be Made to Appoint a Full Bench of 9 to 11 Supreme Court Judges To Determine Final Ruling on Fundamental Rights Petition Cases.

By

Lahiru Pothmulla

The government yesterday maintained that the Supreme Court’s interim order does not mean that the dissolution of parliament has been cancelled and said that it would request for a full-judge bench to hear the case.

Addressing a hurriedly called news briefing last night at the Prime Minister’s Office, Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva said respondents have a right to request for a full-judge bench comprising nine to 11 Judges to hear a case.

“People should note that the Supreme Court has not yet made a final decision on the gazette issued by the President dissolving parliament. The final ruling will be made on December 7. There is no finality in the matter as of yet,” he said.

Continue reading ‘Nimal Siripala de Silva Says Request Will be Made to Appoint a Full Bench of 9 to 11 Supreme Court Judges To Determine Final Ruling on Fundamental Rights Petition Cases.’ »

President Sirisena’s Gazette Notification Has Not Been Abolished,Withdrawn or Invalidated by the Supreme Court that has Only Suspended Its Operation Until Dec 7th Points out Nimal Siripala de Silva.

By Charumini de Silva

Supporters of Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa yesterday insisted that the stay order issued by the Supreme Court had not cancelled the dissolution of Parliament and they would decide whether to attend Parliament after a meeting this morning.

Mahajana Eksath Peramuna leader Dinesh Gunawardena told reporters that the Supreme Court order was a standard move by the court and was not a final judgement and the petitions would continue to be heard by court in the first week of December.

The pro-Sirisena-Rajapaksa faction will meet this morning to decide whether they will attend Parliament and are awaiting the written decision of the court before deciding their next step. However, Namal Rajapaksa tweeted that they would attend Parliament. However, when questioned, the entire group denied any such move.

“First you have to obtain leave to proceed with a Fundamental Rights application. So what has been done today is not the final determination of the matter, but only the granting of leave to proceed. Today’s judgement with regards to the gazette notification issued by the President dissolving Parliament has been challenged in the Supreme Court,” concurred Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) member Nimal Siripala de Silva.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena’s Gazette Notification Has Not Been Abolished,Withdrawn or Invalidated by the Supreme Court that has Only Suspended Its Operation Until Dec 7th Points out Nimal Siripala de Silva.’ »

Attorney -General Jayantha Jayasuriya Tells Supreme Court the Executive Presidency is in Force now and That the President Could Exercise his Executive Powers to Prorogue,Dissolve or Summon Parliament

By Chitra Weerarathne

The Supreme Court yesterday issued an interim order suspending, till Dec. 07, President Maithripala Sirisena’s gazette notification dissolving Parliament and calling a general electioni and granted leave to proceed with all the fundamental rights violation petitions filed against the recent dissolution of Parliament.

At the outset Attorney General, Jayantha Jayasuriya President’s Counsel told the Supreme Court that Article 33/2/C of the Constitution empowered the President to exercise his executive powers, to prorogue, dissolve or summon Parliament and Article 70/1, explained the procedure he was bound to follow, in dissolving Parliament and fixing the dates for the nomination and the election.

The incumbent President had followed the constitutional provisions in dissolving the Parliament and fixing a date for the election, the AG maintained. The aforesaid provisions had been endorsed even after the introduction of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.

Article 62(2) of the Constitution empowered the President to dissolve Parliament.

Continue reading ‘Attorney -General Jayantha Jayasuriya Tells Supreme Court the Executive Presidency is in Force now and That the President Could Exercise his Executive Powers to Prorogue,Dissolve or Summon Parliament’ »

Can President Maithripala Sirisena Be Impeached By The Present Parliament?

By Faizer Shaheid

Elections are only a few days away and the politicians are at it again trying to tear each other apart. The political rivalries have stood the challenge of time, continuing to appeal to summon the inner hopes of the people despite their anticlimactic approach.

Two weeks ago, a fresh saga unveiled when President Maithripala Sirisena marched out from a Cabinet meeting in disgust that Members of the United National Party (UNP) were slinging mud at him regularly. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had to make a statement requesting UNP members from casting aspersions at Sirisena. Still, the cracks began to show.

Although Sirisena had warned the UNP against expressing any dissent to his actions, the President’s own Party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) continued to express anti-UNP sentiments. Especially following the Bond Scam revelations, Sirisena had asserted that he would take the finance related ministries under his wing and maintain control of the economy through a special economic council.

Going even further than this, rumours had been flying around that President Sirisena also wished to replace Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe with a new person at the helm. UNP Parliamentarian Chaminda Wijesiri expressed his outrage with an out and out challenge. He stated that if President Sirisena did replace Ranil Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister, the UNP will prepare to impeach President Sirisena in Parliament.

Continue reading ‘Can President Maithripala Sirisena Be Impeached By The Present Parliament?’ »

Supreme Court Issues “Historically Important” Interim Order Restraining President Sirisena From Dissolving Parliament and Hoding Elections:Ranil May be Able Re-Claim Prime Minister Post?


By Dharisha Bastians and Jeffrey Gettleman

Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked the president from dissolving Parliament, raising the possibility that the former prime minister could reclaim the post after weeks of unnerving political drama.

Sri Lanka has been in crisis since late last month, when President Maithripala Sirisena abruptly fired Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, accusing him of being inept and corrupt. He then swore in a new prime minister: Mahinda Rajapaksa, a popular former president who has been accused of human rights abuses. Many lawmakers and government ministers denounced the move. Protests erupted, and at least one person was killed.

Insisting his firing was unconstitutional, Mr. Wickremesinghe refused to leave his official residence and demanded that Parliament be summoned to prove he still had support.

Instead, Mr. Sirisena dissolved Parliament and called for new elections. Opponents said he had done so because Mr. Rajapaksa could not assemble a majority. The maneuverings were seen as a back door way to bring Mr. Rajapaksa and his allies back into power.

Continue reading ‘Supreme Court Issues “Historically Important” Interim Order Restraining President Sirisena From Dissolving Parliament and Hoding Elections:Ranil May be Able Re-Claim Prime Minister Post?’ »

“President Cannot Act as if he was Like Alice in Wonderland” – Counsel States in Landmark Fundamental Rights Petition Case Regarding Parliament Dissolution and Elections Being Heard by 3 Judge Bench of Supreme Court

By Hafeel Farisz

Negating every argument to the contrary put forward for the dissolution of Parliament, the Supreme Court heard yesterday that the President could not act like he was “Alice in Wonderland” and had to abide by the provisions of the Constitution when exercising the powers vested in the Executive.

Ten Petitioners submitted to court that the powers of the President under Article 33 (2) (c) to dissolve parliament was not an unfettered power and was circumscribed by the express provisions in Article 70 (1) of the constitution. “ Article 33 is an empowering provision but clearly subject to procedure. In fact 33 A is clear in the Presidents accountability to parliament” counsel said. They said the proclamation of the President to dissolve parliament was ab initio void (invalid from the outset) illegal and unconstitutional.

Explaining the “absurdity” of the argument of Aticle 33 (2) (c ) being stand alone “If the power to summon, prorogue or dissolve as provided for in 33 (2) (c ) was to stand alone, that means the President could prorogue parliament indefinitely isn’t it? Could he do that? I ask you could he do that? No he can’t because his powers to prorogue are confined by the provisions of Article 70 (3)” M.A Sumanthiran PC submitted.

Continue reading ‘“President Cannot Act as if he was Like Alice in Wonderland” – Counsel States in Landmark Fundamental Rights Petition Case Regarding Parliament Dissolution and Elections Being Heard by 3 Judge Bench of Supreme Court’ »

Attorney -General Request for More Time Until At Least Wednesday in 11 FR Petitions Against Parliament Dissolution Case is Denied by Supreme Court Due to Urgency of Situation; A-G Directed To Make Presentations on Tuesday 10 am


Civil society members, activists, and politicians alike sought the intervention of the Supreme Court as their last refuge yesterday, filing 11 fundamental rights petitions claiming President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to dissolve Parliament was unconstitutional.

In an unprecedented move, one of the three members of the Election Commission, Dr. Ratnajeevan Hoole, was also among those who petitioned the three-member bench, claiming the move by Sirisena to dissolve Parliament was ex facie illegal, stating that he was duty bound to ensure the Constitution was honoured.

As the country’s political crisis entered yet another new phase, with Sirisena’s sudden move to dissolve Parliament days before his new Prime Minister was to show majority in the House, activists and politicians flocked to the Supreme Court as their last resort. The three-member bench, comprising of Chief Justice Nalin Perera and Justices Prasanna Jayawardane and Priyantha Jayawardane, listened to arguments listed out by petitioners in a courtroom packed to its capacity with lawyers, politicians, and journalists.

The sense of gravity was almost tangible when the Court decided to hear the cases filed just yesterday morning, taking into consideration the urgency of the matter, despite the Attorney General (AG) claiming that proper notice should be given to the Elections Commission. It was pointed out to the Court that one of the three members of the Elections Commission (EC), Dr. Hoole, was himself a petitioner in the matter, therefore the concern on notice was not valid.

Continue reading ‘Attorney -General Request for More Time Until At Least Wednesday in 11 FR Petitions Against Parliament Dissolution Case is Denied by Supreme Court Due to Urgency of Situation; A-G Directed To Make Presentations on Tuesday 10 am’ »

“Ratharang” Rohitha Abeygunawardena Wants to Evict Ranil Wickremesinghe From “Temple Trees” by Resorting to Legal Action Under the Public Property Act.

By Nuwan Senarathna

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) yesterday said legal action would be taken against Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe under Public Property Act for occupying Temple Trees after the dissolution of Parliament.

Wickremesinghe continuing to remain at his Official Residence even after the dissolution was gazetted is unlawful, charged SLPP member Rohitha Abeygunawardena, and could be used to file a case against him.

He alleged Wickreme-singhe’s decision to let numerous parties enter Temple Trees after 26 October had created significant damage to the valuable monuments on the premises. “I believe those who entered Temple Trees might have damaged all the valuable things there, and I have reason to believe that some might even be missing.”

Continue reading ‘“Ratharang” Rohitha Abeygunawardena Wants to Evict Ranil Wickremesinghe From “Temple Trees” by Resorting to Legal Action Under the Public Property Act.’ »

Envoys of Britain, Netherlands, Norway, France, Australia, South Africa, Italy, and Canada Keep Away From Meeting Convened by Dr.Sarath Amunugama to Explain Current Political Situation.

REUTERS: Eight Western countries stayed away from a meeting with Sri Lanka’s Government on Monday to register their protest against President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to dissolve Parliament, diplomatic and government sources said.

Sri Lanka has been in political turmoil since Sirisena fired Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe last month and appointed a pro-China former president, Mahinda Rajapaksa, in his place.

Western countries, led by the United States and the European Union, had been urging Sirisena to convene Parliament and let the legislature determine who should be Prime Minister.

Sirisena reconvened Parliament on 14 November, but on Friday, he dissolved it and ordered a general election for 5 January.

Continue reading ‘Envoys of Britain, Netherlands, Norway, France, Australia, South Africa, Italy, and Canada Keep Away From Meeting Convened by Dr.Sarath Amunugama to Explain Current Political Situation.’ »

“We will not allow the precious freedoms that we fought so hard to secure to be stolen from us”- Ranil Wickremesinghe Issues Statement Pledging to Protect Democracy.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe yesterday pledged to build a broad coalition against what he described as a return to authoritarianism and to continue the battle to restore democracy, transparency and institutional independence in Sri Lanka.

Releasing a statement in response to the national address made by President Maithripala Sirisena on Sunday, Wickremesinghe insisted the United National Party (UNP) would stand by its efforts begun in 2015 to restore democracy to Sri Lanka, protect and uphold the Constitution and work for the development of the people. Conceding that these efforts did not progress as swiftly as was desired, he nonetheless insisted that progress was made and people were allowed to live in freedom.

“We will not allow the precious freedoms that we fought so hard to secure to be stolen from us. I promise you that we who value our democracy will work together to save our nation from this unprecedented crisis,” he said.

Continue reading ‘“We will not allow the precious freedoms that we fought so hard to secure to be stolen from us”- Ranil Wickremesinghe Issues Statement Pledging to Protect Democracy.’ »

Depleted Sri Lanka Freedom Party to Form Broad Coalition with Sri Lanka Podujana Party After Losing Cream of Parliamentary Members to the “Pohottuwa” Party.

By Uditha Jayasinghe

The Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) remained unperturbed by the spate of members leaving its ranks to join the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) yesterday, insisting that its main goal was winning a Parliamentary majority in the likely event of elections.

Over the weekend, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, together with his son Namal Rajapaksa and several dozen SLFP members, took SLPP membership. More key members within the SLFP ranks are expected to accept SLPP membership over the coming days. Political experts have pointed out that the SLFP runs the risk of becoming a less effective party within the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA), ceding pole position to the SLPP.

Continue reading ‘Depleted Sri Lanka Freedom Party to Form Broad Coalition with Sri Lanka Podujana Party After Losing Cream of Parliamentary Members to the “Pohottuwa” Party.’ »

Mahinda Rajapaksa Hits Out at Elections Commission Member Ratnajeevan Hoole For Submitting a Fundamental Rights Petition in the Supreme Court Against the Holding of Elections Calling It “Unethical”,

By Norman Palihawadana and Rathindra Kuruwita

For the first time in world history a Commissioner in charge of facilitating elections had gone to the Supreme Court to prevent elections, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa told The Island yesterday commenting on Ratnajeevan Hoole, a member of the Elections Commission, challenging in courts the President’s decision to dissolve Parliament.

The previous government had appointed politically biased individuals to all ‘independent’ commissions, starting from the Constitutional Council, and the behaviour of the commissioners had created chaos in the country, the Prime Minister said.

Continue reading ‘Mahinda Rajapaksa Hits Out at Elections Commission Member Ratnajeevan Hoole For Submitting a Fundamental Rights Petition in the Supreme Court Against the Holding of Elections Calling It “Unethical”,’ »

“President Sirisena Should Know the Amounts Paid to MP’s for Crossing Over Because he Bought Several MP’s from the UNP and TNA ” -Ranil Hits Back strongly Against Maithripala.

President Maithripala Sirisena should know well the amounts MPs got for crossing over because he had bought several UNP and TNA MPs, UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe said yesterday issuing a statement.

“Because of this horse trading the public faith in MPs has hit an all-time low. It is very unfortunate.”

Continue reading ‘“President Sirisena Should Know the Amounts Paid to MP’s for Crossing Over Because he Bought Several MP’s from the UNP and TNA ” -Ranil Hits Back strongly Against Maithripala.’ »

Chief Justice Nalin Perera, Justice Prasanna Jayawardena and Justice Priyantha Jayawardena Commence Hearing 12 F.R. Petitions Challenging Early Dissolution of Parliament and Holding of Elections; Proceedings To Continue Tomorrow as Attorney – General Required More Time

Sri Lanka’s main political parties, on Monday November 12th 2018 filed legal challenges in the island’s Supreme Court, against the early dissolution of Parliament by President Maithripala Sirisena.

The petitioners said President Sirisena had no powers to dissolve the Parliament under the 19th amendment of the constitution and requested the Supreme Court to issue an order voiding the gazette issued by the President and to suspend the upcoming Parliamentary Election until a verdict is announced.

Continue reading ‘Chief Justice Nalin Perera, Justice Prasanna Jayawardena and Justice Priyantha Jayawardena Commence Hearing 12 F.R. Petitions Challenging Early Dissolution of Parliament and Holding of Elections; Proceedings To Continue Tomorrow as Attorney – General Required More Time’ »

Election Commission Member Ratnajeevan Hoole Files 5 Page Petition in Supreme Court Seeking the Quashing of President Sirisena’s Gazetted Order Dissolving Parliament and Holding Elections.

A member of the three-man independent Election Commission joined a dozen petitioners asking the Supreme Court to declare as illegal the actions of President Maithripala Sirisena against parliament.

Ratnajeevan Hoole filed a five-page petition seeking the quashing of the president’s decree sacking parliament and calling a snap election on January 5.

Continue reading ‘Election Commission Member Ratnajeevan Hoole Files 5 Page Petition in Supreme Court Seeking the Quashing of President Sirisena’s Gazetted Order Dissolving Parliament and Holding Elections.’ »

If the President Feels his Relationship With The Prime Minister is a “Bad Marriage” The Answer is Not to Burn The House Down With The Children In It.


By

Radhika Coomaraswamy

For the most part of the last few weeks we have been in a suspended state of disbelief. Yes, the 2015 government had not lived up to its expectations, some people were plotting for the next election to teach them a lesson, and then lightning struck. The Prime Minister was removed in the stealth of the night replaced by the arch-rival that the President was elected to depose, Parliament was prorogued and then dissolved and a huge cabinet appointed. Neither the Prime Minister nor the cabinet have shown that they have the majority of Parliament behind them and this autocratic rule will continue until January 5, unless the Supreme Court decides otherwise.

Every day my friends and I text each other with information on who is crossing, what is happening here, what is happening there, so much so that we get lost in the weeds and miss the big picture.

What is the big picture?

We are today witnessing the gross abuse of executive power in ways that have been quite unimaginable even to the best of our cynics. It is power being wielded not only against the traditions and customs of a parliamentary tradition but in brazen disregard of the words and terms of the Constitution. When I meet people socially due to spin and confusion they say, “Who cares – one set of crooks vs. another”. This is not about the crooks; it is about institutions, democracy and the system of government you would like in place for your children.

The first institution under attack by this runaway executive is the institution of Parliament. It is true the public image of Parliament and parliamentarians is not very good but they do pass laws and do many other things that allow us to govern ourselves according to a set process. The procedure set for the removal of the Prime Minister is quite clear, Sinhala technicalities notwithstanding. But the most important point in a parliamentary democracy is that the prime minister must enjoy the confidence of a parliamentary majority.

Continue reading ‘If the President Feels his Relationship With The Prime Minister is a “Bad Marriage” The Answer is Not to Burn The House Down With The Children In It.’ »

Mahinda Rajapaksa Renounces Membership of Sri Lanka Freedom Party(SLFP) Co-founded by His Father DA Rajapaksa and Becomes ‘De Jure’ Member of SLPP the Party of which he is Already ‘De -Facto’ Leader.

Former president Mahinda Rajapaksa Sunday renounced his membership in the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and joined the newly formed SLPP ahead of a court challenge to his controversial appointment as prime minister.

Rajapaksa, 72, followed his legislator son Namal in joining the Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Podujana (SLPP) which emerged the largest single party at the February local council elections.

He did not say if he will run for prime minister at the January 5 election as a SLPP candidate or in a coalition within President Maithripala Sirisena’s SLFP.

However, Rajapaksa told reporters at his home Sunday that he was consulting lawyers to face several legal challenges to his appointment as well as the snap elections Sirisena called nearly two years ahead of schedule.

Continue reading ‘Mahinda Rajapaksa Renounces Membership of Sri Lanka Freedom Party(SLFP) Co-founded by His Father DA Rajapaksa and Becomes ‘De Jure’ Member of SLPP the Party of which he is Already ‘De -Facto’ Leader.’ »

Maithripala Led SLFP Left in the Lurch as Mahinda Leads Over 40 UPFA Ex-MP’s of “Purportedly Dissolved Parliament” to Become Official Members of Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna(SLPP) Ahead of Prospective Elections.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

About 40 former UPFA MPs, including former Kurunegala District MP and Prime Minister of the caretaker cabinet Mahinda Rajapaksa received membership of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) yesterday as the party consolidated its position ahead of Nov 19-26 nominations for the January 5 parliamentary polls.

Former Kalutara District MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena yesterday said that the decision had been taken after carefully studying the ground realities. The former MP acknowledged the impact their action could have on the SLFP. The PM went ahead with his anticipated move in spite of strong attempts by the SLFP to discourage them obtaining SLPP membership.

A smiling Abeygunawardena said that he too along with many other former lawmakers would take SLPP membership today (Nov 11). The Island raised the issue at a special media briefing called by SLPP Chairman Prof. G. L. Peiris at the Prime Minister’s Office at Flower Road yesterday about an hour before former MPs were to take SLPP membership.

Asked by The Island whether the move could undermine the SLFP and cause further political turmoil, Abeygunawardena explained discussions were continuing to reach a consensus with the SLFP as regards the party/coalition, symbol and other matters.

Continue reading ‘Maithripala Led SLFP Left in the Lurch as Mahinda Leads Over 40 UPFA Ex-MP’s of “Purportedly Dissolved Parliament” to Become Official Members of Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna(SLPP) Ahead of Prospective Elections.’ »

Sirisena May go down in history as the man who virtually singlehandedly jeopardized nearly one century of democratic governance.

By Professor S W R de A Samarasinghe

President Maithripala Sirisena dissolved Sri Lanka’s parliament on November 9, 2018. Media reports suggest that he disregarded the opinion of the Attorney General who had pointed that it was a violation of the Constitution. This event is organically connected to the sacking of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and replacing him with Mahinda Rajapaksa two weeks earlier on October 26.

Those who support the president’s action have cited Article 33 (2) (c) of the 19th amendment to the Constitution to justify the dissolution of parliament. His critics have cited Article 70 of the same Amendment that prohibits dissolution before the end of 4.5 years from the first date of meeting of that parliament, unless parliament itself by a two-thirds vote requests dissolution.

There is a similar constituitonal dispute over the sacking of PM. Sirisena justifies his action citing the 19th amendment to the Constitution that says “The President shall appoint as Prime Minister the Member of Parliament, who, in the President’s opinion, is most likely to command the confidence of Parliament.” Wickremesinghe urged that parliament must be summoned immediately for a vote of confidence. But Sirisena prorogued parliament until November 16 and thereby revealed that Rajapaksa did not have majority support. If Rajapaksa had majority support it makes no political sense to delay reconvening of parliament.

Supreme Court

Under the Constitution the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all constitutional disputes. Ranil Wickremesinghe, who opposed his dismissal did not immediately appeal to the Supreme Court. It probably was a tactical decision because he would have been confident that Rajapaksa did not have the required 113 votes and an appeal to the Supreme Court would have allowed Rajapaksa more time to “buy” MPs to reach the required number.

Bribery

The available evidence suggests that since October 26th parliamentarians supporting Wickremesinghe were offered two kinds of bribes. The first, very large sums of money funded from unknown sources. The speculation is that at least some of it came from the ill-gotten wealth that the Rajapaksas accumulated when in government.

Continue reading ‘Sirisena May go down in history as the man who virtually singlehandedly jeopardized nearly one century of democratic governance.’ »

President Sirisena in Special Statement Says He Dissolved Parliament ” not to allow those 225 members in the Parliament to fight each other and allow that to develop into a street fights in every part of the country”.

(Text of The Special statement delivered by President Maithripala Sirisena on November 11, 2018)

This is the third occasion in 14 days I am addressing you to explain recent developments. First, on October 26 I explained my views to you after appointing Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister.

Then, at the meeting held at Ape Gama in Battaramulla on 5th November, I explained the political views to you. Today is the third occasion and significantly, this is the first time I address you after dissolving the Parliament. First, I must tell you the circumstances leading to the dissolution of the Parliament very briefly.

Our Parliamentary System began in 1947 after the end of the State Council System. Since then, the country was governed over the years with holding of elections and changing of governments. By the last week, in the highest institute that represents people’s supremacy to usher in a disciplined, ethical ad cultured society, the individual worth of Members of Parliament was estimated as Rs 100 million to Rs 150 million, and in one instance as high as Rs 500 million.

We have experiences about several political crisis and changes in the past. I remember the political crisis due to the opposition to the Lake House Bill in 1964. The government was changed due to that. However, since 1947 we have not seen of dissolution of parliament due to issues of corruption. The Central Bank robbery after 2015, the involvement in various corrupt practices since then and finally the political crisis during the attempts to show the majority support after the appointing of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister and the value placed on Members of Parliament as I mentioned earlier were extremely unfortunate developments. All of you will acknowledge what a tragical situation in politics when the value of the Members of Parliament, who were elected to represent the people, were commercially evaluated.

That was one of the main reasons for the dissolution of the Parliament. The second reason was the most peculiar behavior of the former Speaker, Mr. Karu Jyasuriya. I am extremely sad about that. He is a good friend of mine. The Speakers of our Parliament since 1947, until now, traditionally conducted themselves in neutral and most impartial manner. I wish to state, that his behavior of disregarding Standing Orders and Parliamentary Conventions and attempting not to recognize the appointment of a Prime Minister by the President exercising his Presidential powers was the second reason for dissolving the Parliament.

I must remind you here that, as we take the situation in to account politically, following my victory on 2015 January 08th, when I appointed Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe as the Prime Minister on the very next day, he had the support of a mere 41 members in the Parliament, whereas the sitting Prime Minister D.M. Jayaratne had the support of 162 members in the Parliament.

At that moment, as you know, those who talk about the majority today, were silent about that. Often, the custom is to appoint among the members of the Parliament, someone whom the President, in his opinion, can trust to get the support of the majority in accordance with the constitution. Following that appointment, the support of the majority is obtained in terms of the standing orders of the Parliament and in the Constitution of the country.

However, in our Parliamentary tradition, there has been no occasion on which the majority support for a newly appointed Prime Minister has been tested by vote. Nothing of the sort happens under the standing orders. However, the second statement by Hon. Karu Jayasuriya violated those traditions. In his first statement, he accepted the appointment of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister and stated that he would provide the rights and the privileges of the Prime Minister to him in the Parliament. That means, specially reserving the seat of the Prime Minister and the Office of the Prime Minister in the Parliament. His first press statement admitted this.

However, his second statement was a complete deviation from it. In that he stated that he recognizes Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe as the Prime Minister. I paid serious attention to this development. Members of Parliament from both sides issued various statements in media, that there would lead a big fight when the Parliament is convened on the 14th November. Some speculated that even death of some members would occur.

It appeared to me that, if I allowed the Parliament to be convened on the 14th, without dissolving it, it could have brought about commotion and fights, in every city and every village would lead to very unpleasant and difficult situation for the average citizens of my beloved country.

As such, the best solution was not to allow those 225 members in the Parliament to fight each other and allow that to develop into a street fights in every part of the country. It is my duty and the responsibility to take democracy to guide us, and create the situation for the fifteen million voters in this country take the ultimate decision by choosing their members to the Parliament through a free and fair election.

As such, given the corrupt practices among Parliamentarians as well as the conduct of the Speaker, the best and fair solution to the political crisis that emerged was to allow the people decide in keeping with the principle of democracy. It was with that noble intention of upholding democracy that I dissolved the Parliament. I must state that a permanent and a clear solution to the current situation can be reached through a General Election.

The ultimate responsibility of holding the election rests with the elections commission. We need to extend our fullest support to the election commission.

I humbly make the request from all those involved to extend their unwavering support to the elections commission, officers on election duty and the Tri-forces and the Police in their respective duties. We have chosen a new government. Now it is up to you to defeat the corrupt and elect clean Parliamentarians to represent you. I consider the decision uphold democracy by calling a general election is a welcome by all.

The solution to many burning issues in the country such as the current high cost of living, achieving a prosperous economy, strengthening local industries, obtaining clean foreign investments, building a cultured and disciplined society, and strengthening democracy is to conduct an election and give the people the choice.

For this, purpose we take our Motherland to a new path. In order to create an intellectual young generation suitable for the technologically advanced world, we take steps while preserving our heritage of customs, traditions, ethics and culture for the present generation as well as the future generations.

Furthermore, you have an excellent opportunity now to elect intelligent and experienced representatives to govern. Hence, we give fullest support to the Gazette Notification on holding of General Elections and the steps taken by the Elections Commission accordingly. Here, I would like to remind you about one or two areas in which electoral laws have been violated in the past.

Firstly it is essential to stop misuse of public assets for the electioneering of political parties or candidates. Use of state vehicles for election campaigns must be stopped. As you are aware, during the former government as well as during the current interim government, the Ministries were provided with vehicles for the use of Members of Parliament.

Today, we have an interim government comprising of the President, Prime Minister and Ministers. Under the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, the interim government will function during the elections period until a new government is established. As you know only the President, Prime Minister and Ministers are functioning in the interim government and in accordance with the regulations of the Elections Commission none of the former State Ministers, Deputy Ministers or MPs could use official vehicles for the election campaign.

I request with respect to all the former Ministers and MPs to return their government vehicles to the Secretaries of Ministries immediately. If they do not act accordingly, I will have to ask the police to confiscate the vehicles and I will not hesitate to take strict legal action against the defaulters irrespective of their political party affiliations. I would like to kindly remind that use of government vehicles and public assets for elections is illegal and it should not be done.

Accordingly, we provide fullest cooperation to the Election Commission, Public Officials, Police and Tri Forces to conduct the elections. It is the responsibility of the Party Leaders, Ministers former MPS, candidates and the supporters and the public to ensure that elections are conducted peacefully without any acts of violence and conduct election by acting with dignified and responsible manner.

While reminding all these, I urge you most respectfully to extend fullest cooperation to the efforts to take our great Motherland to be a peaceful, progressive and economically prosperous nation with a great governing structure and an ethical, cultured society that preserve our heritage, customs, traditions, ethics and culture.

Courtesy:Presidents Media Division

What our country so desperately needs right now is for all its people to rise collectively but peacefully for a Common Cause – TO SAVE OUR SRI LANKA!


By Sharmini Serasinghe

“United we stand, divided we fall” Aesop

I am sick, tired and bloody fed up of reading and listening to pessimistic tales of woe on the unprecedented crisis we and our country are facing at this dark moment in time. I am also fed up to the back teeth with reading and listening to lamentations of what should have and could have been done. This in my opinion is sheer stupidity, a waste of time and energy. What has been done has been done dusted and finished. We cannot return to the past and undo it. Period!

Instead, look at what needs to be done and can be done, NOW. We the voting public are collectively responsible for the state our country is in today. Why? Because we all foolishly placed our trust in the dregs in politics to represent us and administer our country!

They have all collectively or not, irrespective of political parties, kicked us all in our faces and let our country down in the most degrading and deplorable ways possible. So stop pointing fingers at the follies you voted for and point it at yourself instead. They did this to our country because we let them. We have looked up and spat on our own faces.

Continue reading ‘What our country so desperately needs right now is for all its people to rise collectively but peacefully for a Common Cause – TO SAVE OUR SRI LANKA!’ »

Dissolution of Parliament was by far the best Solution to be had under Present Circumstances to Preserve Sri Lankan Democracy

By

Rajpal Abeynayake

When Parliament was dissolved with effect from midnight on Friday November 9, the people were given the opportunity to revert to the status quo ante, predating 8 January 2015. On the face of it, this statement may sound curious to some, and perhaps a trifle unclear to others. But yet, most Sri Lankans would rejoice that the people have the right to choose their government as a result of the dissolution, and the numbers at the last LG elections would certainly point to that.

Legal experts have said that the Constitution allows the President to dissolve Parliament under terms of Article 33(2)c, notwithstanding any other Articles. Those who disagree say that the strict interpretation of the Constitution is required under Article 70 (1).

The legal minutiae behind the President’s decision would be clearer as legal minds deconstruct the details in the coming weeks, in the lead up to the election.

It is the veritable back-story behind the dissolution and its legal ramifications that are more pertinent to the issues at hand, that should have an impact on the aforementioned legal aspect as well.

With the passage of time, and in hindsight, there would be a collective national reawakening to the extent of the onslaught on legality, due process and yes — democracy — in the near four year Yahapalana rule. The country has seen nothing as egregious as this attack on good governance, since the grant of independence, and that can be stated with a great sense of responsibility.

A dictatorship was foisted …

The Wickremesinghe UNP foisted a dictatorship on the country, that unfolded in crystal clear clarity to supporter and dissident alike, except that the two groups reacted differently to the fallout.

Continue reading ‘Dissolution of Parliament was by far the best Solution to be had under Present Circumstances to Preserve Sri Lankan Democracy’ »

It is the Nation’s Hope (Against Hope)That the Judiciary Will Solemnly Fulfill Its Role of Being the Protector of the Constitution.

By

Kishali Pinto Jayawardene

As the core of Sri Lanka’s Democratic Socialist Republic implodes in multiple critical ways today, it cannot be said that we were not forewarned.

For not only President Maithripala Sirisena but also each and every one of us must abide by a fundamental truth underlying the legal order. The Constitution cannot be selectively applied because we happen to like someone or dislike another. If this is not recognised, we are condemned to unceasingly wander in a weary cycle of constitutional attrition, much like the bewildered rat in the cage.

Selective constitutional propriety

There is a particular context to that warning. A bare eight months into office in 2015, the President addressed the nation before television cameras stating that even if former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s faction of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party was successful in obtaining a majority at the pending parliamentary election, he would not appoint him as Prime Minister.

Voices of reason should have been aghast at this proclamation. It was an affirmation in no uncertain terms that constitutional propriety will yield to a visceral reaction of whom the President felt should be suitable or not to appoint as Prime Minister.

But few raised their eyebrows. In fact, many applauded. Why?

Because a hated and feared Rajapaksa was at the receiving end of that presidential diatribe. It was on that same reasoning that many clapped and cheered when earlier that same year, a Chief Justice who should have been properly impeached for misbehaviour in office was declared by a Presidential letter ‘never to have been in office’.

As pointed out in these column spaces, that was an assessment that should have been made by Court, not by executive fiat. Yet, this was justified, supported and even urged by those who wax eloquent (then and now) on constitutional propriety.

Even as members of the black-coated fraternity strode up and down Hulfsdorp’s streets bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, demanding the Chief Justice’s summary ouster, I remember receiving a phone call from a colleague who asked me only half in jest, as to why I was not joining the ‘yahapalanaya’ melee. My response was these disastrous precedents will be rued once triumphalism following Rajapaksa’s defeat subsided.

Continue reading ‘It is the Nation’s Hope (Against Hope)That the Judiciary Will Solemnly Fulfill Its Role of Being the Protector of the Constitution.’ »

By Attempting to Bring Mahinda Back to Power, Sirisena is Trying to Obliterate a Decade of Crimes Under the Rajapaksa Regime?

By Gamini Weerakoon

The often cited quote of a former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli: ‘Lies, damn lies and statistics’ kept coming to our minds during the past two weeks when ‘truth’ became a casualty in this pious isle, where a great many take vows to abide by the Fourth Precept of the Panchaseela — morning and night.

“We’ve got more than 113” was the claim of the new political combine of the president of the country, Pohottuwa and Yasapalanaya dropouts while irate UNPers claimed more than 120 or more (with support of allied parties). These statistics simply did not tally with the 225-member parliament. It reminded us also of a saying of the journalist of yore Mark Twain: Statistics are pliable.

This great mathematical and constitutional law conundrum could have been resolved simply by summoning parliament and taking a vote — but that has yet to happen.

The country is agog with those, ranging from three wheel drivers to university dons, splitting legal hairs and juggling with arithmetical calculations for a parliamentary majority. Some of those keeping aloof of this crisis ask: Is there no morality in this whole business? A curt reply we heard was: Morality is best left to morons.

Continue reading ‘By Attempting to Bring Mahinda Back to Power, Sirisena is Trying to Obliterate a Decade of Crimes Under the Rajapaksa Regime?’ »

Speaker of “Illegally Dissolved” Parliament Karu Jayasuriya Calls Upon Public Servants ” to Refuse to Execute Illegal Orders They May Receive No Matter From Whom”.

The Speaker of Sri Lanka’s controversially dissolved parliament has asked citizens and public officials to defend the constitution and warned that the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens are at risk

“As the custodian of Parliament, I have watched over the last two weeks as the executive Branch has seized the rights and usurped the powers of Members of Parliament who were elected to represent the people,” Karu Jayasuriya said in a statement.

“The wilful disregard demonstrated by the executive towards Parliament, the engine of Sri Lanka’s sovereignty, leaves the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens at grave risk of similar abuse.

“Under these dire circumstances, I urge all public servants who have sworn an oath to defend the Constitution to revisit that oath.

“Ask why we are required to pledge fealty to this document and not to any one person or a single position of power. Our foremost duty is to the Constitution.

“I ask all public servants across the country to remember their obligations to this supreme law of our motherland, and to safeguard the independence of the public service, police and the judiciary. I call upon all public servants to refuse to execute any illegal orders they may receive, no matter from whom.

The full statement is reproduced below:

Continue reading ‘Speaker of “Illegally Dissolved” Parliament Karu Jayasuriya Calls Upon Public Servants ” to Refuse to Execute Illegal Orders They May Receive No Matter From Whom”.’ »

Sri Lanka Parliament Dissolution: Is President Sirisena’s Action Legally tenable?


By

Meera Srinivasan

From the time President Maithripala Sirisena sacked Ranil Wickremesinghe on October 26, till he dissolved parliament exactly two weeks later, doubts about the constitutional validity of his moves have been a recurring theme. The dissolution of the House in particular, shortly after Mr. Sirisena’s party declared it lacked numbers for a majority, sparked an instant dispute. Is the action, evidently a politically manoeuvre, legally tenable?


Under Article 33

Former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva argues it is. Speaking to the local media, he has pointed to article 33 (2) (c) in the 19th Amendment, which states “in addition to the powers, duties and functions expressly conferred or imposed on, or assigned to the President by the Constitution or other written law, the President shall have the power to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament.” His position is in line with many of the President’s supporters, who privilege the import of article 33 (2) C, over what other pertinent sections may say.

However, Asanga Welikala, Director, Edinburgh Centre for Constitutional Law terms the dissolution of Parliament “wholly illegal and unconstitutional”.

Continue reading ‘Sri Lanka Parliament Dissolution: Is President Sirisena’s Action Legally tenable?’ »

No one lying politician should have the power to appoint or remove another lying politician unilaterally.

By Gehan Gunatilleke

Let me apologise to building managers in advance.

Imagine entrusting a building to a manager who is dishonest.

To one’s horror, one discovers dishonesty is not a problem confined to one particular building manager, but an affliction common to all building managers. There is a serious dilemma.

The building needs managing, and the building’s owners neither have the time nor the skills to manage buildings. So owners may have little choice but to rely on dishonest building managers.

One option is to keep looking for that one miraculous building manager who is honest. But until then, the building will have to be managed by the dishonest. The other option – the one I am going to propose in this article – is to operate on the assumption that all building managers everywhere are going to be dishonest.

So then the owners must prepare themselves for that inevitability, and try to mitigate the damage of dishonesty, while keeping the building and its contents intact.

It is obviously not true that all building managers are dishonest. But there are some basic truths we cannot escape. The sun sets in the west. Prices rise. Politicians lie.

We Sri Lankan citizens do not look to the east to see a sunset. We are not surprised when the cost of living rises each year. Yet we never cease to be shocked when politicians betray us. Perhaps the current crisis in Sri Lanka is an opportunity for us to reflect on our predicament.

Continue reading ‘No one lying politician should have the power to appoint or remove another lying politician unilaterally.’ »

In the Mahinda-Maithripala “Cat and Mouse” Alliance The Question is Not Whether Rajapaksa Will Topple Sirisena But When!

By

Tisaranee Gunasekara

A certain cat had made the acquaintance of a mouse and has said so much to her about the great love and friendship she felt for her, that at length the mouse agreed that they should live and keep house together.”
– Brothers Grimm (Cat and Mouse in Partnership)

Some words are more evocative than others. Coup is such a word, bringing to mind images of gun-toting soldiers and generals ousting elected politicians. According to the Oxford Dictionary, the word coup originated in the medieval Latin word colpus, meaning blow. Coup d’état is a blow against the state, even when that blow is non-violent and administered by civilian politicians.

A blow against the state was what happened on October 26th, when Maithripala Sirisena sacked Ranil Wickremesinghe, in clear violation of the 19th Amendment.

Mr. Sirisena knew what he was doing. The proof is in the brief letter of dismissal he sent Mr. Wickremesinghe. That letter mentions the provision under which Mr. Wickremesinghe was appointed as the prime minister. It does not mention the provision under which Mr. Wickremesinghe was being dismissed from his post. There is no mention of the provision under which the prime minister was being dismissed, because there is no such provision in the constitution.

The letter is a masterpiece of evasion. Written in Sinhala, it is worded in such a way that a casual reader (and most voters are casual readers of such missives) would not notice that key omission.

“The lie is quite as real as the truth, it works upon the world, transforms it,” said Italian writer Claudio Magrisi. That is what the Sirisena—Rajapaksa combo is trying to do – using mammoth lies to upend the popular perception of reality.

Take, for instance, the widely disseminated lie about a discrepancy between Sinhala and English versions of the relevant section in the 19th Amendment. Had there been such a discrepancy, Mr. Sirisena would have mentioned it in his letter, adding that his action is based on the Sinhala version. He didn’t, because there isn’t – any discrepancy – whatsoever. (The official Sinhala and English versions can be read hereii).

Continue reading ‘In the Mahinda-Maithripala “Cat and Mouse” Alliance The Question is Not Whether Rajapaksa Will Topple Sirisena But When!’ »

Why we Need to keep on Protesting Because we Need to Care About the Things That are Dear to us

By

Anura Gunasekera

Over the last couple of decades, particularly after Mahinda Rajapaksa first became president in, I have written intermittently in various daily and weekly papers, on matters of political interest or significance. At the outset I must declare firmly that I am not a political writer per se or a professional journalist in the real sense of the word. That identification must be reserved for writers who own columns in various papers and regularly comment, comprehensively, clearly and learnedly, on current issues. I , on the other hand, belong to the class of agonized, ordinary citizens, who burst out sporadically when something they value is threatened; the kind of people who write indignant “Letters to the Editor”, when they wish to focus public attention on matters of common interest or value.

Recently I scrolled through my early writings and noticed a disturbing trend. It is that of a gradual change in tone and content of the writing. I find that I have commenced with Hope, steadily degenerating over time to confusion, suspicion, disbelief, anger, discouragement, disillusionment, resignation , cynicism and finally despair.

Despair is now, today

Despair is when a man who first seemed eminently reasonable, articulate but not impassioned, strong in his convictions but unbiased, a man with an ostensibly clean past and who promised a clean, uncorrupt future, a man who promised credibly to right old wrongs and to prevent the commission of such in the future, a man who pledged, very convincingly , to redress inequities and to address inequalities, a man who swore to punish the guilty and to reward the virtuous, suddenly turns his back on everything that he promised before the nation to hold dear, and commits an act of incredible imprudence, that which is glaringly duplicitous, and plunges the entire nation and its machinery in to total chaos.

Despair is when a man who rekindled hope and provided a glimpse of a path to sanity, suddenly commits an act which is both absolutely deceitful and irresponsible . An act which, in the light of events in its immediate aftermath, proves totally damaging to the national fabric and recommits it to the noon darkness which once threatened to engulf it.

Continue reading ‘Why we Need to keep on Protesting Because we Need to Care About the Things That are Dear to us’ »

If the President can Dissolve Parliament at any Time at Will is Correct, then Parliament can be Dissolved by the President Just one day After the new Parliament Meets


By

Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne

There is speculation that Parliament will be dissolved. Arguments have been made for and against the right of the President to dissolve Parliament at will, at any time.

It is a golden rule that in interpreting a Constitution, the Constitution as a whole must be looked at, not at just one provision in isolation. If the issue is related to an amendment made to the Constitution, we need to look at the corresponding provisions before such amendment. The intention of the legislature in amending the Constitution must be considered. If the amendment was consequent to a pledge made at an election, then the circumstances of that election must also be considered. Constitutional provisions cannot be read in isolation, in a vacuum.

Before the Nineteenth Amendment that came into force on 15 May 2015, the Constitution gave the President a near-unbridled power to dissolve Parliament at will. Article 70 gave him the power to so do, subject to just one limitation. If the previous Parliament had been dissolved prior to it completing its six year term, then the President could dissolve Parliament only after one year.

At the Presidential Election of January 2015, one of the main issues raised was the executive presidency. The forces that supported the common candidate were clearly for limiting Presidential powers and strengthening Parliament. One does not have to labour the point.

The Nineteenth Amendment, which was passed with just one Member of Parliament opposing it, reduced the term of Parliament to five years. Provisions that Supreme Court held required a Referendum were amended or dropped. Article 70 of the amended Constitution restricted the power of the President to dissolve Parliament. It now provides that “the President shall not dissolve Parliament until the expiration of a period of not less than four years and six months from the date appointed for its first meeting, unless Parliament requests the President to do so by a resolution passed by not less than two-thirds of the whole number of Members (including those not present), voting in its favour.” Thus, Parliament can now be dissolved by the President in the first four and a half of years of its term only if 150 Members of Parliament so request by a resolution passed in Parliament. The wording is clear and unambiguous.

Continue reading ‘If the President can Dissolve Parliament at any Time at Will is Correct, then Parliament can be Dissolved by the President Just one day After the new Parliament Meets’ »

How Will the Voting Public That Has Been Complaining about Long Delays in Holding Elections React to Political Parties Going to Courts Seeking a Declaration that Parliamentaty Elections are Illegal?


by C.A. Chandraprema

The President unexpectedly dissolved Parliament on Friday night. The proclamation dissolving Parliament states that it was done by virtue of the powers vested in the President by Article 33(2)(c) of the Constitution and Article 70(5) which should be read with Article 62(2). What Article 33(2)(c) – which was a new provision introduced into the Constitution by the 19th Amendment – states is that the President will have the power to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament in addition to the powers, duties and functions expressly conferred or imposed on, or assigned to the President by the Constitution or other written law… Article 62(2) states that every Parliament shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting unless Parliament is sooner dissolved. Hence Article 62(2) buttresses the power conferred on the President by Article 33(2)(c) to dissolve Parliament.

The President’s proclamation dissolving Parliament also quotes Article 70(5) which stipulates among other things that upon the dissolution of Parliament by virtue of the provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 62, the President shall forthwith by Proclamation fix a date for the election of Members of Parliament, and shall summon the new Parliament to meet on a date not later than three months after the date of such Proclamation. The Gazette notification dissolving Parliament also mentions Section 10 of the Parliamentary Elections Act No.1 of 1981 which stipulates that “The President shall, in every Proclamation dissolving Parliament or in any Order requiring the holding date of an election, specify the period during which nomination papers shall be received by the returning officer; and the date on which the poll shall be taken.”

All those requirements have been met in the President’s proclamation dissolving Parliament. The duty conferred on the Elections Commission by Article 104B (1) of the Constitution is that “The Commission shall exercise, perform and discharge all such powers, duties and functions conferred on the Commission or the Commissioner-General of Elections, by the Constitution, and by the law relating to the election of Members of Parliament…”


Can the President dissolve Parliament?

Just before the dissolution actually took place, the UNP had been stressing at every press conference they held, that the President does not have the power to dissolve Parliament. At the same time, members of the Joint Opposition like Udaya Gammamila have been arguing that the President does have the power to dissolve Parliament. The arguments for and against the dissolution of Parliament hinge on the interpretation of Articles 33 and 70 of the Constitution. Dr Jayampathy Wickremaratne had written to the Colombo Telegraph recently, arguing that the President cannot dissolve Parliament because the 19th Amendment had amended Article 70 of the Constitution so that the President cannot dissolve Parliament until the lapse of four years and six months from the date of its first meeting, unless Parliament requests the President to do so by a resolution passed by a two-thirds majority.

Continue reading ‘How Will the Voting Public That Has Been Complaining about Long Delays in Holding Elections React to Political Parties Going to Courts Seeking a Declaration that Parliamentaty Elections are Illegal?’ »

“We are Going to the Supreme Court First Thing in the Morning on Monday November 12” Says TNA Lawyer -Politico MA Sumanthiran as Sri Lanka’s Opposition Parties Resolve to Challenge Dissolution of Parliament.

Sri Lanka’s opposition parties are to challenge in the Supreme Court on Monday, the dissolution of the country’s parliament, which was announced late on Friday by President Maithripala Sirisena.

“We are going to the Supreme Court first thing in the morning on Monday, November 12,” said M.A.Sumanthiran, opposition Member of Parliament, who is also a top Supreme Court lawyer.

Through a gazette notification dated November 9, Lankan President Sirisena dissolved parliament and announced that fresh elections to the House will be held on January 5, 2019, and that the newly elected parliament will meet on January 17.

The opposition’s point of view was best stated by the Lawyers of Democracy in their press release on Friday.

The release said that the “arbitrary move is clearly both unconstitutional and undemocratic.”

“The unconstitutionality is stark, in as much as Article 70 of the constitution expressly prohibits the President from dissolving parliament by proclamation without 2/3rds of the Parliament approving a resolution requesting him to do so at any time during the first 4-1/2 years of its term.”

Continue reading ‘“We are Going to the Supreme Court First Thing in the Morning on Monday November 12” Says TNA Lawyer -Politico MA Sumanthiran as Sri Lanka’s Opposition Parties Resolve to Challenge Dissolution of Parliament.’ »

Maithripala Sirisena Dissolves Parliament in an act of Political Desperation After It Became Evident He had No Majority in the House.

By Chathuri Dissanayake and Uditha Jayasinghe

In an act that smacked of political desperation after it became evident his party may not be able to show majority in the House, President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday dissolved Parliament with elections likely to be held on 5 January.

The Gazette, which was sent by the Attorney General’s Department on Friday evening, was signed by President Sirisena, confirmed a top Minister to Daily FT. The nomination period will be from 19 November to 26 November, according to the Gazette. The new parliament will meet on 17 January 2019. Earlier in the day, the President also issued a Gazette bringing the Government Printing Department under his preview, triggering widespread speculation of a dissolution.

“According to election regulations, which gives three weeks for the Election Commissioner to call for nominations and another five to eight weeks to announce the date for elections, we can speculate polls will be held in early January,” the Minister said.

Upon being notified of the snap decision to dissolve the House, top members of the United National Party (UNP) convened for an emergency meeting to strategise on the next possible course of action. It is also possible the UNP will seek the intervention of the Supreme Court, sources said.

Continue reading ‘Maithripala Sirisena Dissolves Parliament in an act of Political Desperation After It Became Evident He had No Majority in the House.’ »

President Sirisena Dissolved Parliament Because the Govt he Installed Under Mahinda Rajapaksa as PM was Unable to Obtain the Support of 113 MP’s in a Pariament of 225.

Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena on Friday dissolved the country’s parliament on account of the Mahinda Rajapaksa government’s inability to face a No Confidence Motion which was due to be taken up after the reconvening of parliament on November 14.

The Rajapaksa government had been installed by President Sirisena on October 26 after sacking Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in a widely criticized move.

But the Rajapaksa government could not muster the support of a minimum of 113 MPs in a House with a total strength of 225 members to be in power and defeat the No Confidence Motion filed earlier by the Joint Opposition led by Wickremesinghe’s United National Party (UNP).

Only eight MPs from the UNP and the United National Front (UNF) crossed over since October 26.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena Dissolved Parliament Because the Govt he Installed Under Mahinda Rajapaksa as PM was Unable to Obtain the Support of 113 MP’s in a Pariament of 225.’ »

Sirisena Violates Constitution Again By Gazetting Dissolution of Parliament in Breach of 19th Amendment Forbidding it Before Four and a Half Years is Completed.

By K. Ratnayake

Yesterday Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena blatantly violated the country’s constitution and dissolved parliament almost two years before its term officially ends. According to the gazette notification issued last night, new elections will be held on January 5 and the new parliament convened on January 17.

Sirisena’s anti-democratic actions came just two weeks after he sacked Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and appointed former President Mahinda Rajapakse to replace him. Sirisena then prorogued the parliament for three weeks until November 16, later changing the date to November 14 following domestic and international criticism. The prorogation was a crude manoeuvre to give Rajapakse time to secure a governing majority in the 225-member parliament.

Sirisena’s dissolution of the parliament yesterday was announced a few hours after Rajapakse declared that he was still eight MPs short of a majority.

Continue reading ‘Sirisena Violates Constitution Again By Gazetting Dissolution of Parliament in Breach of 19th Amendment Forbidding it Before Four and a Half Years is Completed.’ »

President Sirisena’s Gazette Proclamation Dissolving Parliament Will be Challenged in Courts by UNP Says Mangala Samaraweera.


By

Meera Srinivasan

Avoiding a resolution to Sri Lanka’s political crisis through Parliament, President Maithripala Sirisena late on Friday dissolved the House. The move came just hours after his political front admitted to lacking the majority needed for its controversially installed Prime Minister to be declared legitimate.

Issuing an extraordinary gazette, Mr. Sirisena dismissed the 225-member assembly with effect from midnight, and called for a snap general election on January 5, 2019.

Power struggle

The development comes a fortnight into Sri Lanka’s unprecedented power struggle that saw two rival leaders claiming to be the legitimate Prime Minister.

Caught in a bitter tussle with his Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, with whom he joined hands to form the government in 2015, Mr. Sirisena sacked him abruptly on October 26 and appointed former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his place.

The move drew considerable domestic and international criticism for its apparent defiance of the Constitution. Mr. Wickremesinghe refused to accept the decision and sought a vote in the House to test who commanded its confidence. However, days before Parliament — earlier suspended — was scheduled to reconvene, Mr. Sirisena announced its dissolution.

UNP for legal challenge

Following the announcement, Mr. Wickremesinghe’s United National Party (UNP) convened an “emergency meeting”.

“We are certainly challenging this in court,” senior UNP politician Mangala Samarweera, who was Finance Minister in the government that fell, told The Hindu.

Irrespective of the outcome, the party would also move an impeachment motion against the President, Mr. Samaraweera said, “because he is a menace to the country, a menace to our democratic traditions.”

The UNP was “ready to face election any time”, but felt the need to challenge the dissolution which is “a blatant violation of the Constitution,” he said.


Validity under cloud

While the political logic of the President’s move is evident in the absence of a parliamentary majority for his front, its constitutional validity is questionable. As per the 19th Amendment to Sri Lanka’s Constitution, the President does not have the powers to dissolve Parliament within four-and-a-half years of its convening, unless requested by two-thirds of its members.

The President’s legal team, on the other hand, has invoked Article 33(2) c, which lists the powers to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament, in addition to existing powers. However, critics observe that while the article is a general enumeration of his powers, the specific provision in the 19th Amendment must prevail.

Asked if Sri Lanka’s Election Commission would seek the Supreme Court’s opinion on the matter, ahead of elections, Commission Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya told The Hindu: “No comments.” However, he added: “The President has the powers to fix the date for elections in his proclamation.”

All the same, pressed on the Commission’s position on holding polls when the announcement follows a controversial move, Mr. Deshapriya said: “The Commission will discuss it.”

Earlier on Friday, Sri Lanka’s purported new government said it had “104 or 105” MPs in the 225-member House, in a public admission of lacking majority in the House. Addressing a press conference at the Prime Minister’s office — which Mr. Rajapaksa took over after his disputed appointment — spokesman of the Sirisena-Rajapaksa front Keheliya Rambukwella said, “We have about 105 now”, contradicting Mr. Sirisena’s claim last week of “having the majority”.

Mr. Rajapaksa, who sought early general election even while in opposition, said in a tweet: “As leaders, it is our responsibility and obligation to give the people the opportunity to voice their opinions on the future of #SriLanka.

A general election will truly establish the will of the people and make way for a stable country.” By Friday evening, President Sirisena had sworn in virtually the entire “new cabinet”, that included senior aides of Mr. Rajapaksa and himself in key Ministerial positions.

Courtesy:The Hindu

Sri Lankan President Sirisena Dissolves Parliament and Calls For Elections in January in a Move Described as “Illegal”by Critics.

By Dharisha Bastians and Vindu Goel

The president of Sri Lanka dissolved the country’s Parliament on Friday night and called for elections in January to choose new lawmakers, a move that critics said was illegal, and that deepened a two-week-old constitutional crisis over who is the legitimate prime minister of the island nation.

The move followed President Maithripala Sirisenato’s dismissal in late October of Sri Lanka’s prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and his naming as a replacement a popular former president who had been accused of human rights abuses, nepotism and excessively close ties to China during his tenure.

Mr. Wickremesinghe and many members of Parliament challenged the appointment of his successor, Mahinda Rajapaksa. No major foreign country, including the United States, has recognized the new government. They have urged Sri Lankan leaders to allow Parliament to choose between the two men.

Continue reading ‘Sri Lankan President Sirisena Dissolves Parliament and Calls For Elections in January in a Move Described as “Illegal”by Critics.’ »

Machiavellian Manipulation by Maithripala To Replace Ranil With Mahinda 👑

by D.B.S.Jeyaraj

“Machiavelli is the only political thinker whose name has come into common use for designating a kind of politics, which exists and will continue to exist independently of his influence, a politics guided exclusively by considerations of expediency, which uses all means, fair or foul, iron or poison, for achieving its ends – its end being the aggrandizement of one’s country or fatherland – but also using the fatherland in the service of the self-aggrandizement of the politician or statesman or one’s party.
– Leo Strauss

pic courtesy of: facebook.com/Awantha.artigala

Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli known as Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) was an Italian diplomat,writer,historian and political philosopher who is regarded by some as the Father of modern political science.His most famous work was the political treatise “The Prince” which gained notoriety because it supposedly justified duplicity and a cynical disregard for morality as acceptable means to achieve the ends of gaining or maintaining power.Machiavellianism derived from the name Machiavelli is a word used to describe “the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or general conduct”. The term Machiavellian is often associated positively with pragmatic politics and negatively with political deception and deviousness.
Continue reading ‘Machiavellian Manipulation by Maithripala To Replace Ranil With Mahinda 👑’ »

The Sri Lankan Economy is now in Acute Crisis, Leaving the Sirisena-Rajapakse Government with no Room to Manoeuvre.

By Saman Gunadasa

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, installed in a political coup on October 26, has also appropriated the post of finance and economic affairs minister. Last week, in a bid to deflect the opposition of working people, he announced cosmetic measures to ease the economic and social crisis facing workers, peasants and the poor.

Rajapakse is trying to paint himself as “people-friendly” in contrast to Ranil Wickremesinghe who was unconstitutionally sacked as prime minister by President Maithripala Sirisena.

In fact, whichever faction of the Sri Lankan ruling class finally consolidates power in the ongoing bitter political struggle, it will certainly deliver further blows to the living conditions of working people.

On Monday, Mangala Samaraweera, former finance minister, responded to Rajapakse’s announcement by warning that the measures would “put the economy in peril” and expressed concern that they would undermine the austerity program dictated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Rajapakse’s announcements included small reductions in the prices of petrol, diesel, dhal, chickpeas, wheat grain and sugar. Other measures reduced the telecom levy on phone charges from 25 to 15 percent; increased the value added tax (VAT) threshold from 12 million to 24 million rupees; waived interest on farmer’s loans below 50 million rupees for the past three years; and reduced fertiliser prices for crops other than paddy rice by a third.

Continue reading ‘The Sri Lankan Economy is now in Acute Crisis, Leaving the Sirisena-Rajapakse Government with no Room to Manoeuvre.’ »

“Those Who Caused a Crisis by Violating the Constitution Are Now Discussing About Solutions to the Crisis by More Violations of the Constitution “-Prof Jayadeva Uyangoda.

Sounding a dire warning, veteran political scientist Prof. Jayadeva Uyangoda yesterday severely criticised what he termed as an open and ongoing violation of the Constitution, which could plunge the country into anarchy, unless there was moral intervention by the public and community leaders.

Delivering the commemorative oration at the ceremony held to mark the third death anniversary of Sobhitha Thero, Prof. Uyangoda drew stark parallels with Sri Lanka’s past and lauded Sobhitha Thero as a visionary leader who had always stood for democracy, at times by himself. However, this latest crisis threatens to dwarf all previous struggles endured by Sri Lanka’s democracy and could well end in a crisis of never-before-seen proportions unless the moderate and mature public step up to demand redress. President Maith-ripala Sirisena was a notable absentee at the event, which he had attended on two previous occasions.

“It is clear now that those who have created the crisis are struggling to settle it. They are now trying to find solutions for the crisis that began with violating the Constitution once, through violating the same further. Right now they are discussing how they can further violate the Constitution,” he told the gathering.

Continue reading ‘“Those Who Caused a Crisis by Violating the Constitution Are Now Discussing About Solutions to the Crisis by More Violations of the Constitution “-Prof Jayadeva Uyangoda.’ »

Traffic Chaos in Colombo Ranil Wickremesinghe Supporters Proceed in Cavalcade of Motor Cycles,Three-wheelers,Cars &Vans to Independence Square Protest Rally Demanding Re-convening of Parliament.

A rally of hundreds of cars carrying supporters of Sri Lanka’s deposed Prime Minister brought chaos to Colombo streets on Thursday as they demanded that Parliament be reopened.

A noisy cavalcade of motorcycles, auto-rickshaws, cars and vans took loyalists of ousted Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to a rally to hear speeches slamming the President for sacking the head of Government last month.

Continue reading ‘Traffic Chaos in Colombo Ranil Wickremesinghe Supporters Proceed in Cavalcade of Motor Cycles,Three-wheelers,Cars &Vans to Independence Square Protest Rally Demanding Re-convening of Parliament.’ »

Former Civil Servant and Academic Dr.Devanesan Nesiah Announces Return of “Deshamanya” medal and Certificate Awarded by President in 2017 In Protest Against Maithripala Sirisena Flouting Democracy.

The following is the text of an open letter sent in by Dr. Devanesan Nesiah, a retired civil servant who has who has served the country since 1959. In 2017, he was awarded with the National Honours by President Sirisena.

7 November 2018

His Excellency

Maithripala Sirisena,

President,

Sri Lanka.

Your Excellency,

I write as a loyal citizen of Sri Lanka and a proud recipient of the great titular honour of ‘Deshamanya’, that Your Excellency saw fit to confer on me in March of 2017. My children, grandchildren, other relatives and close friends gathered from three continents in celebrating the award and the Presidential recognition of my services to our great nation.

I barely knew you earlier, but my family, friends and I were greatly elated when you were elected President. That elation and hope, Your Excellency, has given way to disappointment over your very blatant flouting of our seventy-year-old democracy, in recent weeks.

Continue reading ‘Former Civil Servant and Academic Dr.Devanesan Nesiah Announces Return of “Deshamanya” medal and Certificate Awarded by President in 2017 In Protest Against Maithripala Sirisena Flouting Democracy.’ »

SB Dissanayake Admits he Offered UNP MP Palitha Range Bandara 200 Million Rupees and Cabinet Minister Portfolio and Says Making Such Offers are not Bribes.

By

Sandun A Jyasekera

Minister S.B.Dissanayake today admitted that the UPFA had only the support of 105 MPs at the moment but said they were ready to show 116 on the 14th, the day Parliament reconvenes after prorogation.

Addressing a news briefing, Minister Dissanayake said he was in contact with a number of Parliamentarians of the TNA, SLMC and ACMC to woo them to the UPFA and added he was confident that UPFA would be in a position to show the support of 116 MPs.

Continue reading ‘SB Dissanayake Admits he Offered UNP MP Palitha Range Bandara 200 Million Rupees and Cabinet Minister Portfolio and Says Making Such Offers are not Bribes.’ »

Arjuna Ranatunga Shows 15 Minute News Clip at Press Conference and Alleges Powerful UPFA Politico was Behind the Mob Attack on His Life at the Petroleum Corporation Head Office in Dematagoda.

By

Harischandra Gunaratna

Former Petroleum and Petroleum Resources Minister Arjuna Ranatunga yesterday called upon the police to conduct an impartial probe and apprehend those responsible for mayhem at the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation Head Office at Dematagoda on 28 Oct. Two persons were shot by one of Ranatunga’s security guards and one of them succumbed to his injuries.

A 15- minute video clip of the incident was shown at a news conference organised by the former Minister in Colombo. Ranatunga said a powerful UPFA politician was behind the incident.

Continue reading ‘Arjuna Ranatunga Shows 15 Minute News Clip at Press Conference and Alleges Powerful UPFA Politico was Behind the Mob Attack on His Life at the Petroleum Corporation Head Office in Dematagoda.’ »

“We Believe the Present Crisis is an Attempt by the Executive to Actively and Deliberately Undermine the Constitution of Sri Lanka” – Lawyers for Democracy

(A Short Brief on the Present Constitutional Crisis in Sri Lanka Whether the Speaker can convene Parliament by Lawyers for Democracy)

Since the commencement of the constitutional crisis on 26th October 2018, the Speaker has made several public statements on the need to reconvene Parliament. His most recent statement issued on 5th November reiterates this position. This is not the first time a Speaker of Parliament has made such a decision.

In 2003 the then-Speaker, Joseph Michael Perera, came to the same conclusion. We also have a rich history of decisions where the separation of powers is clearly established. In this short brief, Lawyers for Democracy, sets out why the reconvening of Parliament is in accordance with the spirit and the letter of our Constitution, and must be respected and upheld by all parties.

Continue reading ‘“We Believe the Present Crisis is an Attempt by the Executive to Actively and Deliberately Undermine the Constitution of Sri Lanka” – Lawyers for Democracy’ »

President Sirisena May Opt to Conduct a Referendum to Enable Dissolution of Parliament if Mahinda Rajapaksa Is Unable To Gain Majority Support Among Present Crop of MP’s.

By

Kelum Bandara

The political equation is constantly changing these days making it difficult for anyone to conclude which side would emerge with the required parliamentary majority to form a stable administration by the time Parliament meets on November 14.

The United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) led by President Maithripala Sirisena was scoring high in the political scorecard with the support of 105 members in comparison to the United National Party’s (UNP) 98 seats early this week.

However, the UPFA suffered a setback when MP Manusha Nanayakkara, who was sworn in as a Deputy Minister, relinquished his office and stood with the UNP leadership.

It dealt a psychological blow to the game of toing and froing. Perplexed, the other members, who had initial plans to switch allegiance to the new Government, now have second thoughts regarding their moves.

It has led to the delay in the swearing in of Cabinet Ministers. The remaining 13 Cabinet slots are kept open for anyone defecting from the UNP.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena May Opt to Conduct a Referendum to Enable Dissolution of Parliament if Mahinda Rajapaksa Is Unable To Gain Majority Support Among Present Crop of MP’s.’ »

Will President Sirisena Carry Out His Threat Of Resigning within an Hour if Ranil Wickremesinghe Wins the Vote of Confidence in Parliament and is Affirmed as Prime Minister?

By P.K.Balachandran

The on-going power struggle in Sri Lanka between two powerful groups, one led by President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa; and the other led by ousted Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe; has been keeping the 21 million citizens of the island nation on the edge since October 26.

It was on October 26 that President Sirisena upset the political apple cart when he suddenly and unceremoniously sacked Prime Minister Wickremesinghe and appointed former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his place.

Sirisena followed this up the very next day by proroguing parliament up to November 15, clearly to enable Rajapaksa to garner supporters among Members of Parliament (MPs) to acquire a parliamentary majority.

But this triggered a domestic and international outcry. Those wanting to be polite called it a “constitutional coup” since the sacking was permissible (albeit in a convoluted way) under the official Sinhalese version of the constitution. But the more blunt critics dubbed it a “Machiavellian power grab in flagrant violation of the constitution.”

Continue reading ‘Will President Sirisena Carry Out His Threat Of Resigning within an Hour if Ranil Wickremesinghe Wins the Vote of Confidence in Parliament and is Affirmed as Prime Minister?’ »

Wickremesinghe Willing To Work With Sirisena Again: “I’ll have no problem working with him, that’s a question you must ask him” Ranil Tells “The Hindu”.

By

Meera Srinivasan

Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said he is willing to work with President Maithripala Sirisena, who abruptly sacked him on October 26, if given a chance to prove his majority in Parliament.

Caught in an unprecedented power struggle, Mr. Wickremesinghe is trying to claim legitimacy as the country’s premier, after Mr. Sirisena appointed former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his place and subsequently prorogued Parliament until November 16.

The bitter relationship between Mr. Sirisena and Mr. Wickremesinghe appears to have further deteriorated this week, with the President resorting to personal attacks on him at a recent public meeting.

Continue reading ‘Wickremesinghe Willing To Work With Sirisena Again: “I’ll have no problem working with him, that’s a question you must ask him” Ranil Tells “The Hindu”.’ »

Kumar Welgama Hits Out at President saying Sirisena Has Made Sri Lanka the Butt End Of Jokes Around The world and warns the Country is Going Down the Precipice.

Former president Mahinda Rajapakse’s Party fired the first salvo against President Maithripala Sirisena on Wednesday saying his move had crippled the country and demanded that parliament be summoned immediately.

Kumar Welgama, a former minister in Rajapaksa’s cabinet, said Sirisena had made Sri Lanka the butt-end of jokes around the world and the issue of the prime minister should be resolved through the legislature.

“Our country is going down the precipice. No one is working in government offices,” Welgama told reporters after a meeting with parliamentary officials. “Public servants want to know who the real PM is. People are confused.”

Welgama who is a senior member of Rajapakse’s party said he wanted the suspension of parliament ended for the two men to face a vote on the floor of the House to decide who commands a majority.

Continue reading ‘Kumar Welgama Hits Out at President saying Sirisena Has Made Sri Lanka the Butt End Of Jokes Around The world and warns the Country is Going Down the Precipice.’ »

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya Will Allow Suspension of Standing Orders to Enable Vote To Determine Whether Purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa Has A Majority When Parliament Re-convenes.

Parliamentary Speaker Karu Jayasuriya announced Wednesday that he will allow a vote on the floor of the House to end a bitter power struggle and a constitutional that have crippled the country for nearly two weeks.

Jayasuriya’ said he will go along with the wishes of 116 legislators who wanted him to take up the question of resolving the crippling political crisis.

Continue reading ‘Speaker Karu Jayasuriya Will Allow Suspension of Standing Orders to Enable Vote To Determine Whether Purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa Has A Majority When Parliament Re-convenes.’ »

UNP Parliamentarian Hirunika Premachandra’s Threatened Through Telephone call to Aunt That Her Political Career Would be Destroyed If She Did not Accept a Ministerial Portfolio .

By

Yohan Perera

UNP MP Hirunika Premachandra today alleged that a person had called her aunt, who was residing abroad and had threatened to put an end to her political career if she failed to accept a Ministerial portfolio.

Ms Premachnadra told a media briefing that her aunt had told the caller that she would not accept any portfolio.

“My aunt had told the caller that her niece cannot be bought over. Then the caller said they would destroy my political career,” she alleged.

Continue reading ‘UNP Parliamentarian Hirunika Premachandra’s Threatened Through Telephone call to Aunt That Her Political Career Would be Destroyed If She Did not Accept a Ministerial Portfolio .’ »

TNA Defector Viyalendran MP who Joined Govt on Request Made By President Maithripala Sirisena says “This does not mean I support Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa”

By

Lahiru Pothmulla

United National Party (UNP) Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe failed to serve the Tamil people though the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) stood by him for more than three years, Deputy Minister of Regional Development (Eastern) S. Viyalendiran said today.

Addressing a media briefing held at the Prime Minister’s Office, he said the North and East should be developed first and then they can focus on finding solutions to the national question.

Continue reading ‘TNA Defector Viyalendran MP who Joined Govt on Request Made By President Maithripala Sirisena says “This does not mean I support Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa”’ »

Tamil National Alliance Explains to President Sirisena the Reasons For Decisions Taken by the TNA and That They would Stand by Those Decisions Which are Irreversible.

(Text of a press release issued by the Tamil National Alliance(TNA) spokesperson M. A. Sumanthiran MP on November 7th 2018)

A delegation of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) comprising of Mr. R. Sampanthan Leader of the TNA, Mr. Selvam Adaikkalanathan MP, Mr. D. Siddaarthan MP, Mr. M.A.Sumanthiran MP, on the invitation of His Excellencey the President Mr. Maithiripala Sirisena met with him at the Presidential Secretariat on Wednesday 7th.

The said meeting lasted one and half hours.

The situation currently prevailing in the country was discussed at length.

Continue reading ‘Tamil National Alliance Explains to President Sirisena the Reasons For Decisions Taken by the TNA and That They would Stand by Those Decisions Which are Irreversible.’ »

Newly Appointed Deputy Minister of Labour and Foreign Employment Resigns Post, Supports Ranil Wickremesinghe As Prime Minister and Flies Off To Singapore Without Attending Press Conference Called By UNP.

By Chathuri Dissanayake

In a fresh turn in the maze that is the country’s current political crisis, the United National Party (UNP) yesterday made fresh claims over Manusha Nanayakkara’s support, as the ministers of the Cabinet which existed before 26 October 2018 hurried to reclaim office.

Nanayakkara is said to have resigned from his new post as the Deputy Minister of Labour and Foreign Employment in the Sirisena-Rajapaksa Government.

With Nanayakkara failing to come before the media to declare his support to Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, the UNP pulled out all the stops to ensure that the crossover was seen as authentic. A video clip of Nanayakkara in discussion with Wickremesinghe was shown at the press briefing to announce the crossover, held at Temple Trees last morning. Another clip of Nanayakkara giving a statement pledging his support to the democratic process was also shown.

A letter purported to be the resignation letter tendered by Nanayakkara highlights that the Sirisena-Rajapaksa Government has neither been accepted by the Speaker nor the international community.

Continue reading ‘Newly Appointed Deputy Minister of Labour and Foreign Employment Resigns Post, Supports Ranil Wickremesinghe As Prime Minister and Flies Off To Singapore Without Attending Press Conference Called By UNP.’ »

Western Diplomats Behaviour in Sri Lanka is a Clear Violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations Adopted in 1961

By

Dr. Kalinga Seneviratne

On the night of October 26, most Sri Lankans were taken by surprise when President Maithripala Sirisena named his former leader and later political foe Mahinda Rajapakse as Prime Minister. Within minutes, celebratory firecrackers were lit across the country, as Rajapakse is still widely popular, especially among the Sinhalese majority, for having brought peace to a nation rocked by a 30-year civil war.

But the news flashed across the world by the Western-dominated international media was different. They depicted the President’s move as dipping Sri Lanka into a new era of “dictatorship” and possible violence, going back to the old narrative of Rajapakse as a “ruthless” human rights violator and war criminal. They went to the sacked prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, still holed up in his official residence refusing to quit, and his supporters including Western-funded NGOs, for quotes that fit their narrative.

Wickremesinghe, who comes from an Anglicised, urban background, is widely unpopular with the predominantly Sinhala Buddhist majority because he is seen as unable to connect with them and too aligned with Western, Christian interests. He is more comfortable speaking in English than in the native Sinhala language. President Sirisena, who is the son of a rural Sinhalese Buddhist rice farmer, is poles apart culturally, and when both of them came together to defeat Rajapakse in 2015, many people wondered how long the alliance could last.

Their differences have now come to the surface, and were reflected in Sirisena’s address to the nation on October 30, in which he explained Wickremesinghe’s sacking through a devastating put-down of his character.

Continue reading ‘Western Diplomats Behaviour in Sri Lanka is a Clear Violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations Adopted in 1961’ »

An Explanation – in -Brief of the Political Crisis in Sri Lanka By the South Asian Magazine “Himal”,

Sri Lanka faces an unprecedented constitutional and political crisis following President Maithripala Sirisena’s move to dismiss Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and appoint former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his stead on 26 October 2018, which has been challenged by Wickremesinghe as being illegal.

What explains these sudden political developments, which unseated the political party that had the largest number of seats and commanded majority support in the Parliament? What is the constitutional status of the president’s prime ministerial dismissal and appointment? And what should we expect in the next few days in Sri Lankan politics?

Continue reading ‘An Explanation – in -Brief of the Political Crisis in Sri Lanka By the South Asian Magazine “Himal”,’ »

Dinesh Gunawardena “Assumes Charge” of Leader of the House Office By Force With Connivance of Seargeant -at – arms alleges Leader of the House Lakshman Kiriella.

By

Meera Srinivasan

In his first public confrontation yet with President Maithripala Sirisena since the dramatic events of October 26, Speaker Karu Jayasuriya on Monday indicated that he would not accept former President Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister until his majority is proven in parliament.

Citing the opinion of a majority of lawmakers that the recent changes were “undemocratic” and “inconsistent with the traditions of Parliament”, the Speaker said in a media statement: “I wish to emphasise that I am compelled to accept the status that existed previously until such time that they and the new political alliance prove their majority in Parliament.”

Continue reading ‘Dinesh Gunawardena “Assumes Charge” of Leader of the House Office By Force With Connivance of Seargeant -at – arms alleges Leader of the House Lakshman Kiriella.’ »

UNP Crossover Manusha Nanayakkara Who was Appointed Deputy -Minister of Labour and Foreign Employment Resigns “New” Portfolio Saying he will Accept Ranil Wickremesinghe as Legitimate Prime Minister in Accordance With Speaker’s Statement.

Labour and Foreign Employment Deputy Minister Manusha Nanayakkara has resigned from his portfolio.

Nanayakkara is expected to support UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe.

Nanayakkara was first elected to Parliament on the UNP ticket but later chose to support former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

In a strongly worded letter of resignation, Deputy Minister Manusha Nanayakkara informed President Maithripala Sirisena that it was Speaker Karu Jayasuriya’s recognition of UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe as the lawful Prime Minister of the country that prompted him to leave the Sirisena-Rajapaksa government.

Continue reading ‘UNP Crossover Manusha Nanayakkara Who was Appointed Deputy -Minister of Labour and Foreign Employment Resigns “New” Portfolio Saying he will Accept Ranil Wickremesinghe as Legitimate Prime Minister in Accordance With Speaker’s Statement.’ »

“If I am to follow the verbal assurance given by the President, it is my duty as Speaker to summon Parliament by 7th November and restore stability in the country” -Karu Jayasuriya

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya yesterday said he would have to continue with the previous status in Parliament until a different clear majority was shown in Parliament. A majority of the MPs had requested him to accept the previous composition, he said.

The Speaker said in a statement that MPs had pointed out that the recent changes were against the Constitution and parliamentary tradition and had requested him to accept the previous composition of Parliament.

He said he could not remain silent anymore on the information received by him that people’s representatives were being offered perks and privileges in violation of democratic principles.

Full text of the Speaker’s statement:

Even though I have remained silent so far at a time our motherland is embroiled in an unprecedented crisis, I consider it my paramount duty to act in accordance with my conscience for the protection of rights and privileges of the majority of the Members of Parliament including the Leader of the Opposition of the Parliament and the prevention of the destruction of democracy that we have safeguarded up to now.

Continue reading ‘“If I am to follow the verbal assurance given by the President, it is my duty as Speaker to summon Parliament by 7th November and restore stability in the country” -Karu Jayasuriya’ »

Mahinda Says Maithripala Removing Sitting Prime Minister Ranil and Appointing Him was a “Serious and Grave” Decision Which He Would not have Taken if he were the President.

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, following his controversial accession to premiership, hailed the opportunity to share the same political platform with President Maithripala Sirisena, who appointed him to the position after four years of rivalries which began in 2014.

“Our separation was temporary,” Rajapaksa claimed amidst cheers of his supporters at the “Ratama Rakina Jana Mahimaya” rally, organised to show people the strength of the Sirisena-Rajapaksa alliance.

Continue reading ‘Mahinda Says Maithripala Removing Sitting Prime Minister Ranil and Appointing Him was a “Serious and Grave” Decision Which He Would not have Taken if he were the President.’ »

Maithripala and Mahinda Address ‘Ratama Rakina Jana Mahimaya’ Together at Battaramulla Expressing “Happines” After a “Brief Animosity” of Four Years.

By Chathuri Dissanayake and Nuwan Senaratne

President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday stood by his Prime Minister, insisting that he had the 113 MPs needed to hold Parliament and defended the move as a last ditch effort coming after he had offered the position to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya and UNP MP Sajith Premadasa.

Thousands of supporters flocked to show support to President Maithripala Sirisena’s controversial move to appoint President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s as Prime Minister on Monday. As traffic police cordoned off parts of Parliament Road to facilitate the rally with tight security, busloads of Rajapaksa loyalists gathered at the Parliament Roundabout despite continuous rain to show support to the newly formed union.

The rally, named ‘Ratama Rakina Jana Mahimaya’, organised to show the strength of the Mahinda camp as the faceoff between the two Prime Ministers intensified, was participated by a majority of the higher echelons of United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) and Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), with majority airtime being dominated by the members of the latter.

Continue reading ‘Maithripala and Mahinda Address ‘Ratama Rakina Jana Mahimaya’ Together at Battaramulla Expressing “Happines” After a “Brief Animosity” of Four Years.’ »

President Sirisena Says He Offered to Make Karu Jayasuriya or Sajith Premadasa the Prime Minister Instead of Ranil but Because Both Refused he Had to Appoint Mahinda as PM.

By
Lahiru Pothmulla

President Maithripala Sirisena said today that he offered the premiership to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya first and then to UNP Deputy Leader Sajith Premadasa before considering former President Mahinda Rajapaksa for the post of Prime Minister.

Addressing a public rally named ‘Rata Surakina Jana Mahimaya’, he said the UNP MPs who met him during the past few days asked him why Mr. Rajapaksa was appointed the Prime Minister contrary to the aspirations of UNPers as they were the ones who installed him as the president in 2015.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena Says He Offered to Make Karu Jayasuriya or Sajith Premadasa the Prime Minister Instead of Ranil but Because Both Refused he Had to Appoint Mahinda as PM.’ »

MP’s Palitha Thewarepperuma and Hesha Vithana Arrested On Complaint Made by “Mawbima Wenuwen Ranawiruwo” Convenor Ajith Prasanna That He Was Assaulted by the Two UNP Parliamentarians Outside “Temple Trees”.

By

Darshana Sanjeewa

UNP MPs Palitha Thewarapperuma and Hesha Vithana had been arrested after they surrendered to the Kollupitiya Police Station this morning over an alleged attack on Major (Rtd) Ajith Prasanna, Police Spokesman SP Ruwan Gunasekera said.

Continue reading ‘MP’s Palitha Thewarepperuma and Hesha Vithana Arrested On Complaint Made by “Mawbima Wenuwen Ranawiruwo” Convenor Ajith Prasanna That He Was Assaulted by the Two UNP Parliamentarians Outside “Temple Trees”.’ »

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya Issues Statement Recognizing the “Status Quo” That Existed Before Oct 26th Until a Majority is Proved by a “New” Group.

Sri Lanka’s Speaker Karu Jayasuriya has said that he is recognizing the status quo before the political crisis that was triggered on October 26, until a majority is prove by a new group.

He said a majority of members had pointed out to him that recent events were unconstitutional and against the traditions of the country and had asked for the situation before the crisis (state quo ante) to be recognized.

Until a group “demonstrates a majority in parliament I re-iterate that I am compelled to recognize the situation that prevailed earlier,” Jayasuriya said in a statement issued in Sinhalese.

Continue reading ‘Speaker Karu Jayasuriya Issues Statement Recognizing the “Status Quo” That Existed Before Oct 26th Until a Majority is Proved by a “New” Group.’ »

President Sirisena Announces Via Gazette Notification That Parliament Would be Re-convened on November 14th 2018 at 10 am

President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday announced, through a gazette notification, that Parliament would be reconvened on Nov. 14.

The gazette says that parliament will meet at 10.00 am on that day.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena Announces Via Gazette Notification That Parliament Would be Re-convened on November 14th 2018 at 10 am’ »

Maithripala Sirisena Within the Space Three and a half years Has Pulled Off Two Dramatic Political Reversals in the Country’s Electoral History

By Lasanda Kurukulasuriya

Maithripala Sirisena is not exactly a type of politician described as ‘charismatic’ or ‘revolutionary.’ But in the space of three and a half years he has pulled off two dramatic political reversals in the country’s electoral history. The first was in 2014 ,when he broke ranks with the ruling UPFA coalition to be the UNP-led Opposition’s common candidate in the 2015 election. Now he’s unceremoniously dumped his UNP coalition partner, pulling the UPFA along with him to appoint his one-time bete noire Mahinda Rajapaksa as his prime minister.

With the UPFA having to prove a majority in the House in the days ahead in order to chrystalise the move, the situation has parallels with that which prevailed when the UNP-led coalition failed to garner a clear majority in 2015, and multiple cross-overs helped to consolidate power.

There has been furious debate on the legality/constitutionality or otherwise of the president’s actions, by loyalists on either side. This discussion related to the 19th amendment that redefined the presidential powers. The main point of contention is that the Sinhala version of the Constitution is said to include ‘removal’ by the president as one of the circumstances in which the prime minister ceases to hold office, whereas this condition is missing in the English version. It is the Sinhala version that prevails when there is a dispute, according to lawyers. A Supreme Court determination, if sought, would no doubt help settle the legal question.

Meanwhile, a closer look at the social context might help understand the forces at work in this drama. While constitutional experts split hairs over the interpretation of Article 48 subsection (1), or the meaning of Article 46 subsection (2), the reality is that these events come at a time of deep discontent among ordinary people across the country. The mood was best summed up by the chief prelate of a Colombo temple. In rough translation what he said was “Voters, when these things happened, did not cry, lament, light lamps, or curse. There was not a sound.” Ven. Galaboda Gnanissara Thera told reporters: “The people were hard-pressed, trampled upon, saddened and living in fear. In any other country if a government elected by a majority was toppled, people would rise up. But here nobody lost any sleep. I too slept well.”

Continue reading ‘Maithripala Sirisena Within the Space Three and a half years Has Pulled Off Two Dramatic Political Reversals in the Country’s Electoral History’ »

President Sirisena seems to think that political corruption is a legitimate weapon as long as he uses it.

By Jayadeva Uyangoda

“My country has been betrayed again” –Pablo Neruda, Memoirs

In his explanation of why he removed Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe from the office of Prime Minister, President Maithripala Sirisena cited policy and personal differences between the two.

An analysis of his speech shows that personal reasons are stronger than policy reasons and the personal is very much political. The text of President Sirisena’s address to the nation reminds the citizens of the explanation he offered in the latter part of 2014 as to why he left his former political boss, Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa. There too, the personal was political.

In this note, I will try to show how, after October 26, the political is personal and devastatingly personal for me.

October 26 was a Friday. Although I am not a superstitious person, I look back at that rainy, gloomy Friday as the day I felt personally betrayed too. I can no longer think of Mr. Maithripala Sirisena as a symbol of political hope for the citizens of this country, and particularly for the younger generation. His actions that Friday marked a shockingly tragic end to the political hope and promise he had epitomized since November 21, 2014.

I campaigned actively for the newly formed opposition front, which fielded Mr. Sirisena as its Presidential candidate for the 2015 January election. I did so primarily because of Mr. Sirisena, or Maithri, as we began to call him affectionately. If Ranil were the candidate, I would have just voted for him merely as an act of protest against Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa, but would not have actively campaigned for his victory. It is Maithri who made me active in electoral politics again, against a backdrop of many political disappointments with other leaders, including Chandrika and Ranil.

For me voting for Rail was purely instrumentalist. In contrast, campaigning for Maithri was a politico-moral duty.

Not only me. A 51.28 percent of Sri Lankan voters found that at last there was now a man they could trust, identify themselves with, and entrust their democratic political destinies. He was actually the last hope of democracy in Sri Lanka, at a time when Sri Lankan politics under the existing regime, was moving in the direction of what we political scientists call ‘hard authoritarianism.’

To stop that nightmarish drift, a regime change was needed. For a regime change, a credible presidential candidate other than Ranil Wickremasinghe was needed. A man or woman who could personify the democratic political hopes of future generations of our citizens, particularly the young ones and first-time voters, needed. The new leader had to be one who had not earlier tasted political power as a government leader, and therefore unsullied by a record of corruption, abuse of power, megalomania and personalized rule, and limitless political ambitions.

Mr. Maithripala Sirisena fit the bill. He could turn the tide of political despair and cynicism. Somewhere towards the end of November 2014, two young vegetable sellers in rural Neluwa, Hiniduma, articulated to me in simple language the hope that I too had shared: “Who else can we trust except Maithri?’

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena seems to think that political corruption is a legitimate weapon as long as he uses it.’ »

Issue Before Sri Lanka is the Constitutional Impropriety of President Sirisena’s Actions and Not Sympathy for the United National Party.

By

Kishali Pinto Jayawardene

Continuing his swift disastrous strike last Friday, President Maithripala Sirisena has taken a familiar problem of public fury with an inept and malfunctioning Government to a perilously extra-constitutional trajectory, prompting deep revulsion on the part of even those strongly critical of many follies of the United National Party (UNP).

Repercussions of the President’s actions

This step was prompted by fiendish legal advice by whom the President referred to as ‘neethi visharadayo’ (legal experts). It is safe to presume that this supposed expertise is perchance heavily influenced by pedestrian considerations of power and position rather than with the niceties of constitutional law. Chaos has been unleashed on a bewildered public as global consternation continues to rise. Harsh international repercussions seem certain if Sri Lanka remains suspended in a state of democratic limbo. Regardless of which ‘Prime Minister’ wins the day when Parliament is finally convened, this will have lasting inimical impact.

Within the country, there is only so much abuse that a beaten and battered democratic system can take. Internationally, the extreme fragility of the country’s democratic state is showcased in unflattering international headlines. All that is not to the good. But even as fury is heaped (justifiably) on the President’s head, the UNP’s part in bringing about this veritable constitutional cataclysm must be put on record. As such, it must do far more than merely apologise for putting forward Maithripala Sirisena as the common candidate in 2014/2015. This week’s flippant explanations for the ‘small mistakes’ it made will not do.

Continue reading ‘Issue Before Sri Lanka is the Constitutional Impropriety of President Sirisena’s Actions and Not Sympathy for the United National Party.’ »

The No Holds Barred Game Of “Grabbing” Sri Lankan Members of Parliament 💰


By

D.B.S.Jeyaraj

The continuing political crisis in Sri Lanka has resulted in a great numbers game being played now. The aim of the game is to gain majority support among members of Parliament. Both Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe as well as the purported Prime minister Mahinda Rajapaksa who was appointed amidst controversial circumstances by President Maithripala Sirisena need to command the confidence of the House when the currently prorogued Parliament is re-convened.The immediate objective of both the Maithripala -Mahinda camp as well as the Ranil Wickremesinghe camp is to win the numbers game.Both sides need the minimum magic number of 113 to gain a majority of at least one in a legislature of 225.

President Maithripala Sirisena, Batticaloa district MP Sathasivam Viyalendran and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa

When the crisis began, the Ranil Wickremesinghe led United National Front consisting of the UNP and other Tamil and Muslim parties had 107 seats, The combined strength of the Sirisena led UPFA and SLFP factions, the Joint opposition – Podujana Peramuna MP’s led by Mahinda Rajapaksa and the group of 16 SLFP/UPFA “orphaned”MP’s numbered 95. After the splintering and defections began both sides now have over a 100 each. The Sirisena -Rajapaksa duo however want at least 120 MP’s in hand before a vote count is taken on or before the 16th. It is the final floor test in the House tht will determine the outcome of the current crisis. The UNP led Govt received a morale booster when the Tamil National Alliance(TNA) officially extended issue -based support to “De Jure” Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.

The new Sirisena-Rajapaksa “ De -Facto” Govt has at the moment 17 ministers including Sirisena,8 state ministers and 8 deputy ministers.Almost all the ministers are from the SLFP factions, UNP renegades and other parties like the EPDP and CWC. The core group of Joint opposition MP’s are not taking any posts so that those crossing over from other parties could be accommodated. Intensive campaigning is going on by both sides. Mahinda’s side is enticing as many MP’s as possible from other parties.Rani’s side is trying hard to restrain its members from crossing over. It is also trying to woo a few MP’s from the other side but with little success so far.

Continue reading ‘The No Holds Barred Game Of “Grabbing” Sri Lankan Members of Parliament 💰’ »

Both Presidents Chandrika in 2004 and Maithripala in 2018 Removing the Same Prime Minister Shows the Fault is With Ranil Wickremesinghe?

By

Dr.Dayan Jayatilleka

1. Can you think of two personalities more contrasting than Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga and Maithripala Sirisena?

2. But as President, they both did the same thing to the same Prime Minister—in 2003/4 and 2018!

3. Basic logic teaches us that when two different factors behave in the same way towards the same single factor, then it shows you something about the constant factor/s, not about the variables.

4. The main constant factor was Ranil. The other constant was that both CBK and MS headed the Sri Lanka Freedom Party.

Continue reading ‘Both Presidents Chandrika in 2004 and Maithripala in 2018 Removing the Same Prime Minister Shows the Fault is With Ranil Wickremesinghe?’ »

It is Hard to See How President Sirisena Can Emerge With Any Personal or Political Credibility From This Crisis Even if He Trumps The Technicalities

By

Namini Wijedasa

On the afternoon of October 26, parliamentarians from President Maithripala Sirisena’s Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) gathered at his official residence. They did not know the meeting would be a precursor to one of the most tangled constitutional debates in the country’s history.

Sirisena told them he was forming a new administration. He ordered a party official to give notice that the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA), which includes the SLFP, is quitting the government. He then summoned his most bitter adversary, Mahinda Rajapaksa, to the venue and swore him in as Sri Lanka’s 16th prime minister. It was over in four hours.

Even supporters of Rajapaksa, the former president who had defeated the Tamil Tigers and was now an ordinary member of parliament, were baffled. What just happened? Today, for all intents and purposes, Sri Lanka has two prime ministers: Ranil Wickremesinghe and Rajapaksa. And until questions of law, constitutionality and parliamentary majority are unsnarled in one or both of two forums, the legislature and the Supreme Court, the status quo could continue.

Continue reading ‘It is Hard to See How President Sirisena Can Emerge With Any Personal or Political Credibility From This Crisis Even if He Trumps The Technicalities’ »

What I Owed My Mother Above All Else Was The Introduction To Jesus.

By

Dr.Dayan Jayatilleka

[Lakshmi Sylvia de Silva—Birth anniversary November 5th]

Lakshmi Sylvia de Silva

For historical, cultural and civilizational reasons, the Kremlin means much more to the Russian people, but to those of us from the global South, it has been a center of a special kind of power, a power that balances the world, a center of power that has housed history-making figures. Standing in the Kremlin, absorbing the historical atmosphere, imagining those figures, looking around and above at the glittering splendor, and then directly facing the third such outstanding Russian figure of world history in modern times, it was quite natural that I should think of my father, Mervyn de Silva, but it was less expected even by me, that I should think of my mother Lakshmi.

There was a direct progression that brought me from childhood to where I was standing on October 11th 2018 to hand my credentials over to President Putin and talk to him for several minutes, having earlier had a chat with the world’s most outstanding Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. When I asked Minister Lavrov whether he could recall Mervyn de Silva from his days in Colombo, he visibly brightened and remarked “Yes, of course! He and my Ambassador used to have discussions frequently and I used to be the translator!” On his visits to Moscow on which I would accompany him and my mother, Mervyn would meet top Russian (at the time, Soviet) foreign policy personalities such as Dr. Georgi Arbatov, the leading Soviet expert, advisor and negotiator on the USA and nuclear arms talks and write about his conversations in the international and Sri Lankan press. When I visited the think-tank the PIR Center in Moscow, the founder, Dr Vladimir Orlov, recounted how we were introduced, when I was ambassador to the UN Geneva, by his mentor, Gen. Dmitri Evstafiev (formerly of the KGB), Chairman of the PIR Center and a friend of my father.

This time around, I have not yet had a meal at the monumentally grand Stalin-era Hotel Ukraine, at which I stayed with my parents as a 7 year old boy on our first visit to Moscow as guests of the Soviet Foreign Ministry, when my father was not yet the editor of the Daily News, only the Deputy Editor of the Observer.

Just as Lenin said of the Revolution, my road back to Russia was hardly as “broad, smooth and straight as the Nevsky Prospect”, but that too was because of my father and the modern heritage of Russia, because I sought amateurishly to put into practice what I had read in the works of Lenin I had taken armfuls of from the libraries of his Russian, Chinese, Cuban, East German and Czech friends, and bought in bookshops in London and America in my early teens, utterly ignorant that linguistic, cultural and religious factors had come to the forefront in my society in a manner that deflected any attempted application of radicalized universalist Reason.

But why am I saying this on my mother’s birthday? Because, as I realized in the Kremlin’s magnificent Alexander Hall itself, my father would have been unable to achieve what he had if not for my mother, and I too would not have become what I am except for her, though I did rebel against her in a manner I never reacted against my father while I did dissent from him.

Continue reading ‘What I Owed My Mother Above All Else Was The Introduction To Jesus.’ »

Namal Rajapaksa Reveals in NDTV Interview That President Sirisena had Been Talking to his Father for about 4 or 5 Months Before Swearing in Mahinda as Prime Minister.

Less than a week after what was seen as an abrupt move by the President to replace the Prime Minister, Namal Rajapaksa, the son of the newly sworn-in Prime Minister, said that his father and the President had been in talks for around “four to five months”.

On 26 October, President Maithripala Sirisena fired the elected Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and replaced him with Mahinda Rajapaksa. On Thursday, Namal Rajapaksa, in an interview with NDTV, said that his father was sworn in on the President’s “invitation and wish” and that the two leaders had been in talks for months.

Continue reading ‘Namal Rajapaksa Reveals in NDTV Interview That President Sirisena had Been Talking to his Father for about 4 or 5 Months Before Swearing in Mahinda as Prime Minister.’ »

Can Maithripala Sirisena and Mahinda Rajapaksa Re-unite Politically?

By
D.B.S.Jeyaraj

Ranil Wickremesinghe is Green!
Mahinda Rajapaksa is Blue!
President Maithripala Sirisena,
Which Political Colour Are You?

Former British prime minister and renowned statesman Sir Winston Churchill in a memorable radio speech over the BBC in 1939 referred to Russia in this way – “It (Russia) is a riddle,wrapped in a mystery,inside an enigma”. Keen observers of the current political scene in Sri Lanka may very well be excused if they veer around to the viewpoint that the Island’s current Executive President too fits Churchill’s description of being a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

“Enigmatic Mysterious Riddle”

The main reason for President Sirisena being perceived as an “enigmatic mysterious riddle” is due to the unpredictable and somewhat unorthodox political conduct of the “ Polonnaruwa Potentate”.It was only last week that this column described this peculiar political tendency in these words – “The perplexing political conduct of Sri Lankan President Pallewatte Gamaralalage Maithripala Yapa Sirisena has in recent times defied many norms and values of conventional politics. The turns,twists and turnarounds of the President are unfathomable to many. So uncertain have Maithripala’s political moves and manoeuvres been that the only certainty about Sirisena is his uncertainty. Many are his topsy -turvy inconsistencies. He has been consistent in his inconsistency.”
Continue reading ‘Can Maithripala Sirisena and Mahinda Rajapaksa Re-unite Politically?’ »

Gotabhaya Rajapaksa Goes to “Temple Trees” for Private Meeting With Ranil Wickremesinghe Following Invitation By UNP Leader.

A sudden hush-hush meeting between ousted Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe and former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa at Temple Trees on Thursday was the cause of wild speculation, but officials said the discussion was aimed at a peaceful resolution to the constitutional deadlock.

Spokesman for the former Defence Secretary Milinda Rajapaksha said that the meeting had lasted seven minutes, from 4.10 p.m. to 4.17 p.m., and discussions were centred on measures to be taken to prevent “chaos” in the wake of the island’s roiling political crisis.

In a Facebook clarification about the meeting, the Spokesman said the former Defence Secretary had gone to Temple Trees on Wickremesinghe’s invitation.

Continue reading ‘Gotabhaya Rajapaksa Goes to “Temple Trees” for Private Meeting With Ranil Wickremesinghe Following Invitation By UNP Leader.’ »

“We thought we were getting a Mandela as president. Instead we got a Mugabe.” – Ex-Minister’s Comment About President Sirisena.

FIRST TO GO was the navy honour guard, in crisp uniforms with brass buttons. Then the maintenance staff departed, followed by the cooks and gardeners and cleaners. The next day no drivers showed up, marooning a fleet of fancy cars in the compound’s garage. By the third day all but a token ten out of a normal complement of 1,008 dedicated security personnel—round-the-clock shifts of police, watchmen, bodyguards and the like—had abandoned Temple Trees, the stately official residence of the prime minister of Sri Lanka.

Its sole inhabitant, Ranil Wickremesinghe, insists for now on staying. The suave 69-year-old, a four-time prime minister, says he will only leave when it is clear that he is no longer constitutionally entitled to the residence. To his supporters, who have crowded Temple Trees to protect him from eviction, this means when he is no longer able to command a majority in the 225-seat parliament.

Perplexingly for this mildly prosperous island-state of 21m people, it is not clear whether Mr Wickremesinghe can or not.

Continue reading ‘“We thought we were getting a Mandela as president. Instead we got a Mugabe.” – Ex-Minister’s Comment About President Sirisena.’ »

118 of 225 MP’s Meet Speaker Karu Jayasuriya in Parliament Committee Room and Submit Resolution Refusing to Accept President Sirisena’s Appointment of Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister .

By Dharisha Bastians and Jeffrey Gettleman

Sri Lanka’s politics plunged into deeper turmoil on Friday when a majority of the country’s parliamentarians refused to recognize the appointment of the new prime minister amid rising tensions and accusations of millions of dollars in bribes.

Last week, President Maithripala Sirisena unexpectedly fired Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, accusing him of being inflexible and corrupt, and replaced him with Mahinda Rajapaksa, a former president who is considered by many to be the strongman of Sri Lankan politics. Human rights investigators have accused Mr. Rajapaksa of war crimes dating to the country’s civil war.

Since last week both Mr. Rajapaksa and Mr. Wickremesinghe have claimed to hold power, setting off a constitutional crisis in this island nation, a popular tourist destination and a major producer of tea and coconuts.

While Mr. Rajapaksa has been meeting with foreign diplomats and making the rounds of government offices in the seaside capital, Colombo, Mr. Wickremesinghe has been holed up in the stately prime minister’s residence, Temple Trees. Hundreds of his supporters are standing guard outside, vowing to protect him.

Continue reading ‘118 of 225 MP’s Meet Speaker Karu Jayasuriya in Parliament Committee Room and Submit Resolution Refusing to Accept President Sirisena’s Appointment of Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister .’ »

Ranil Wickremesinghe Confirms in NDTV Interview that President Sirisena Had Insinuated at a Heated Cabinet Meeting. About an Indian Spy Agency Plotting his Assassinastion .


Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe yesterday confirmed that President Maithripala Sirisena had in fact insinuated that an Indian spy agency was involved in plotting his assassination at a heated Cabinet meeting two weeks ago.

Details of the explosive Cabinet meeting made local and international headlines, but President Sirisena and members of the Government staunchly denied the claims, which Presidential aides said nearly caused an ‘intra-State crisis’.

In an interview with NDTV’s Sreenivasan Jain from Temple Trees yesterday, when asked about President Sirisena’s alleged statement, Wickremesinghe said: “There was an insinuation. That’s how many members of the Cabinet construed it – maybe he said it in the heat of the moment.”

Continue reading ‘Ranil Wickremesinghe Confirms in NDTV Interview that President Sirisena Had Insinuated at a Heated Cabinet Meeting. About an Indian Spy Agency Plotting his Assassinastion .’ »

Parliament Wont be Dissolved Even if the Vote on Account was Defeated in Voting Saus Nimal Siripala de Silva.

By Aruna Bogahawatte

Parliament would not be dissolved even if the Opposition defeated the government’s vote on account to be presented shortly, Transport and Civil Aviation Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva said, yesterday.

Addressing a media conference, at the SLFP headquarters in Colombo, the Minister said that the Opposition would not be able to muster support enough numbers to defeat government’s vote on account, which would be presented, when the new session of parliament commences, for the first three months of next year and thereafter the government would present a budget proper to parliament, De Silva said.

Continue reading ‘Parliament Wont be Dissolved Even if the Vote on Account was Defeated in Voting Saus Nimal Siripala de Silva.’ »

Pressure Mounts on Speaker Karu Jayasuriya to Re-Convene Parliament Immediately With or Without President Sirisena’s Sanction.

By Chathuri Dissanayake

With President Sirisena remaining non-committal on reconvening Parliament before 16 November despite assurances given, the constitutional crisis, now in its eighth day, remains in deadlock in spite of repeated requests to immediately call the House to session.

The United National Party (UNP) yesterday made a great show of numbers at the Party Representatives meeting held in Parliamentary Committee rooms called by Speaker Karu Jayasuriya.

As Sirisena drags his heels on making an official announcement on reconvening the Parliament before 16 November, pressure is now mounting on Speaker Jayasuriya to act immediately.

Speaking at the Party representatives meeting, Leader of the House UNP Parliamentarian Lakshman Kiriella called on the Speaker to represent the voice of the majority members of the Parliament to reconvene immediately.

Continue reading ‘Pressure Mounts on Speaker Karu Jayasuriya to Re-Convene Parliament Immediately With or Without President Sirisena’s Sanction.’ »

Leader of the House Lakshman Kiriella Hands Over No Confidence Motion Against Purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa Appointed on Oct 26 and Purported Govt to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya

Leader of the House Lakshman Kiriella informed the Speaker in writing that the Parliament has no confidence in the newly appointed Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa or the subsequent appointments.

The letter said “No-Confidence in the purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa or the purported Government appointed on or after 26 October”.

The Speaker has promised to include the motion in the Order papers on the first day Parliament reconvenes, Kiriella told Daily FT. “We have asked the speaker to include this, and he said he will do so,” he said.

Continue reading ‘Leader of the House Lakshman Kiriella Hands Over No Confidence Motion Against Purported Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa Appointed on Oct 26 and Purported Govt to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya’ »

Sirisena -Rajapaksa “Govt -in -Formation” Announces a Series of Relief Measures to Including the Reduction of Selected Essential Items to Ease the High Cost of Living

Noting that the Maha cultivation season had begun under favourable weather conditions throughout the country and the economy was about to gain an impetus with all hydro reservoirs reaching full storage capacity, the government yesterday announced a series of relief measures to ease the high cost of living by reducing prices of selected essential commodities including fuel.


The following is the text of a Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs communiqué titled Programme for Economic Revival explaining the new measures:

The President, and the Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs have raised concerns regarding the serious setback in the economy as reflected in the persistently low growth rates during the last 3 years along with the rising cost of living. The Prime Minister is of the view that ill-conceived economic and financial policies of the previous government have led to this situation by marginalising local entrepreneurs, industries and domestic production.

Continue reading ‘Sirisena -Rajapaksa “Govt -in -Formation” Announces a Series of Relief Measures to Including the Reduction of Selected Essential Items to Ease the High Cost of Living’ »

“Purawesi Balaya” Co-convenor Gamini Viyangoda Alleges That the “Illegally Constituted Sirisena-Rajapaksa Govt Wants ti Sabotage Investigations Into Several High Profile Accountability and Mega-Corruption Cases.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Purawesi Balaya co-convenor Gamini Viyangoda alleges that what he calls the illegally constituted Sirisena-Rajapaksa government wants to sabotage investigations into several high profile accountability and mega corruption cases.

Dismissing President Maithripala Sirisena’s claims that he had invited his predecessor Mahinda Rajapaksa to take over premiership due to alleged conspiracy targeting him, Viyangoda insisted that both parties wanted to derail investigations.

Viyangoda alleged that President Sirisena had conveniently forgotten why he had been fielded as common candidate at the January 2015 presidential polls by a coalition comprising the UNP, the JVP, the SLMC and a collective of civil society organizations.

The civil society activist alleged that President Sirisena repeatedly interfered with investigations launched following the 2015 change of government. Viyangoda cited the case of President Sirisena thrice preventing the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) from arresting a former lawmaker (The Island withheld the name) close to the Rajapaksas for obvious reasons.

Continue reading ‘“Purawesi Balaya” Co-convenor Gamini Viyangoda Alleges That the “Illegally Constituted Sirisena-Rajapaksa Govt Wants ti Sabotage Investigations Into Several High Profile Accountability and Mega-Corruption Cases.’ »

Purported Removal of Wickremesinghe and Purported Appointment of Rajapaksa as PM are Both Unconstitutional and all Subsequent Steps Taken are “Void Ab Initio”- Dr.Jayampathy Wickramaratne

Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne has issued the following summary of his statement at a recent media briefing on the current crisis:

A constitutional crisis has been precipitated with President Sirisena purporting to remove Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe and purporting to appoint Mahinda Rajapakse MP as Prime Minister on 26 October 2018.

Before the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution (which came into force on 15 May 2015) Article 43 of the Constitution provided as follows:

“The President shall appoint as Prime Minister the Member of Parliament who in his opinions is most likely to command the confidence of Parliament.”

Continue reading ‘Purported Removal of Wickremesinghe and Purported Appointment of Rajapaksa as PM are Both Unconstitutional and all Subsequent Steps Taken are “Void Ab Initio”- Dr.Jayampathy Wickramaratne’ »

With Their Understanding of Political Power Being Different,Will There be a Fresh Power Struggle Between the “old” President Sirisena and his Newly Appointed Prime Minister Rajapaksa?

By Jayadeva Uyangoda

A major point of great significance being debated in Sri Lanka these days is the validity of the actions of Sri Lanka’s president to sack his prime minister and swear in a replacement. President has claimed a few times that his actions are entirely in accordance with the constitution. He has also clarified that prior to his action on October 26, he obtained legal advice.

President Sirisena, unlike his sacked prime minister, is not well versed with constitutional law. Therefore, it is entirely correct on his part to obtain legal clearance of his anticipated action from his advisors who posses professional background and expertise in law.

President’s lawyers seem to have advised him that it was legally correct to use the clause 42 (4) in sacking the incumbent prime minister and appointing a new person to the office of the PM.


Value Framework

The important question whether the Article 42 (4) under the 19th Amendment empowers the president to remove a prime minister from office at will. Since this clause is now so well known among the public, I refrain from quoting it. But, both the wording of that clause, which is a part of the 19th Amendment, and the constitutional value framework now operating in Sri Lanka do not grant the President authority to remove the prime minister from office.

Continue reading ‘With Their Understanding of Political Power Being Different,Will There be a Fresh Power Struggle Between the “old” President Sirisena and his Newly Appointed Prime Minister Rajapaksa?’ »

Sri Lanka’s parliament is like a veritable auction house where elected MPs can be purchased by the highest bidder

By Sasanka Perera

When President Maithripala Sirisena sacked Prime Minster Ranil Wickremesinghe on 26th October 2018, and prorogued Parliament until 16th November, he injected new meaning to Sri Lanka Tourist Development Authority’s global sales pitch, ‘a land like no other.’ Indeed, in what land other than Lanka would a sitting Prime Minister be sacked without his knowledge in the late evening of a Friday with the cover of the impending weekend, followed by a gazette notification, also issued to confirm the sacking? For me, as a non-constitutional expert, the President’s Friday evening political stunt appears illegal and unconstitutional.

Since the 19th amendment to the constitution was introduced in 2015 with the blessings of both Sirisena and Wickremesinghe, the idea was to curb the unmitigated power of the executive presidency to remove the Prime Minister arbitrarily. Under its provisions, the Prime Minister will cease to be in office only due to death, resignation, or by losing his position as a Member of Parliament. Alternatively, this can also happen if the government itself lost the confidence of Parliament if it was defeated at the introduction of the annual budget or in a vote of no confidence (Articles 46: 2 and 48). But none of these have happened. Though the President has the power to appoint a new Prime Minister, it can only be done if the incumbent has lost power in one of these three ways.

Continue reading ‘Sri Lanka’s parliament is like a veritable auction house where elected MPs can be purchased by the highest bidder’ »

Two Cabinet Ministers, Five State Ministers and Six Deputy Ministers From the SLFP/UPFA Sworn in by President Sirisena.



Thirteen cabinet ministers, State ministers and Deputy were sworn in before President Maithripala Sirisena at the Presidential Secretariat today November 1st 2018. The Breakdown is as follows –

CABINET MINISTERS:

Duminda Dissanayake sworn in as Minister of Irrigation, Water Resources and Disaster Management

Dayasiri Jayasekara sworn in as Minister of Skills Development and Vocational Training

STATE MINISTERS:

Piyasena Gamage sworn as State Minister of Youth, Women & Child Affairs

Lakshman Seneviratne sworn in as the State Minister of Defence

M.L.A.M. Hizbullah sworn in as the State Minister of Highways and Road Development

Continue reading ‘Two Cabinet Ministers, Five State Ministers and Six Deputy Ministers From the SLFP/UPFA Sworn in by President Sirisena.’ »

If Vote on Account To be Presented by Mahinda Rajapaksa When Parliament Re-convenes Is Defeated in a Vote,then President Sirisena Will Dissolve Parliament and Hold New Elections.

Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa have decided to go for a Vote on Account and not a vote of Confidence in their government when parliament meets later this month.

If the government wins the Vote on Account it means that the Rajapaksa government has enough support in parliament and that the government can stay. It is as good as a Vote of Confidence.

But on the other hand, if it is defeated on account of the ability of the opposition United National Front (UNF) to stay together, the President can dissolve parliament and order fresh elections.

Continue reading ‘If Vote on Account To be Presented by Mahinda Rajapaksa When Parliament Re-convenes Is Defeated in a Vote,then President Sirisena Will Dissolve Parliament and Hold New Elections.’ »

President Sirisena Will Re-convene Parliament on Nov 5th and not on Nov 16th but Speaker Will Allocate Prime Minister Seat to Mahinda Rajapaksa Gazetted as PM.


By

Meera Srinivasan

In the face of growing calls to end week-long political impasse in the country, Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena has reconvened Parliament on November 5.

“Parliament will reconvene on Monday,” a top official at the President’s office told The Hindu on Thursday morning, confirming Mr. Sirisena’s decision to partially revoke his order that suspended the House till November 16.

The announcement makes a floor test possible, where controversially deposed Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe — sacked by Mr. Sirisena on Friday — and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, appointed in his place, could prove their competing claims to majority in the 225-member House.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena Will Re-convene Parliament on Nov 5th and not on Nov 16th but Speaker Will Allocate Prime Minister Seat to Mahinda Rajapaksa Gazetted as PM.’ »

What is the Real Reason Behind Reduction of Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Security Detail From 1000 to 10?

By C. A. Chandraprema

In the middle of the sensational events of the past few days, the sacking of one prime minister and the appointment of another, the multiple press conferences being held by the rival camps, the shooting incident at the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation, the petroleum strike, and the crossovers and counter crossovers taking place, one event that went almost unnoticed was the reduction of the former prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s (RW) security detail from around 1,000 to just ten. If this was a temporary tactic to get the squatters in Temple Trees out, then it is quite understandable. However, if it is a permanent reduction, then that means that the alleged assignation plot affair has gone much further than anyone imagined and that the President has heard something that we have not heard.

What is important here is not our gut feelings or opinions, but what kind of tape recordings President Maithripala Sirisena has been listening to. It is true that the UNP went to extremes to keep the Rajapaksas out of politics by bringing in the constitutional provision that dual citizens would not be allowed to contest elections. That was brought in specifically to keep Gotabhaya and Basil Rajapaksa out of politics. Then they restored the provision that anyone who has held the position of President for two terms cannot contest again to in order to keep Mahinda Rajapaksa out. Then they increased the age limit to contest a presidential election in order to keep Namal Rajapaksa out.

Continue reading ‘What is the Real Reason Behind Reduction of Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Security Detail From 1000 to 10?’ »

President Sirisena Tells Four Ambassadors Including New US Envoy Alaina Teplitz That Sri Lankan Parliament will meet on Nov 5th as Originally Scheduled.

The Sri Lankan parliament will meet on November 5 as originally scheduled, President Maithripala Sirisena told the four Ambassadors who had presented their credentials on Thursday.

Meanwhile, the Speaker formally announced the seating arrangements in parliament according to which the seat allotted to the Prime Minister will be given to Mahinda Rajapaksa who was appointed Prime Minister by President Sirisena on October 26.

Ambassadors who presented their credentials on Thursday were: Alaina Teplitz, Ambassador of the United State of America; Akira Sugiyama, Ambassador of Japan; Eric Lavertu, Ambassador of the Republic of France; Ashraf Haidari, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.

Continue reading ‘President Sirisena Tells Four Ambassadors Including New US Envoy Alaina Teplitz That Sri Lankan Parliament will meet on Nov 5th as Originally Scheduled.’ »

Sirisena Tells SLFP Organizers in Colombo That He Wont Remain as President for Even One Hour If Ranil was Re-appointed as Prime Minister.

By

Ajantha Kumara Agalakada

President Maithripala Sirisena has said that he would neither let the North and East to be merged nor allow the country to be a federal state.

He told the SLFP electoral organizers who met him in Colombo that he would have to be killed to get those two done.

The President has told the organizers that some groups had been adamant about the merger of the North and East and the formation of a federal state.

He has said he would not remain as President even for an hour if Ranil Wickremesinghe was reappointed the Prime Minister.

Continue reading ‘Sirisena Tells SLFP Organizers in Colombo That He Wont Remain as President for Even One Hour If Ranil was Re-appointed as Prime Minister.’ »

How Sampanthan Made Wigneswaran The TNA Northern Chief Minister Candidate In 2013

BY D.B.S.JEYARAJ

“Blow, blow, thou winter wind, Thou art not so unkind, As man’s ingratitude” – William Shakespeare ~ “As You Like It”

It’s official now!

Canagasabapathy Visuvalingam Wigneswaran has announced the launch of a new political formation known as the “Thamizh Makkal Koottani” meaning Tamil Peoples Alliance(TPA). The retired Supreme court Judge who was until a few days ago the Northern province chief minister has split from the “Thamizh Thesiya Koottamaippu” or Tamil National Alliance(TNA) and declared his intent to form the TPA which is expected to electorally target the TNA. Some may even argue that the raison d’etre for the ‘new’ TPA is the objective of politically undermining the ‘old’ TNA.

Rajavarothayam Sampanthan & Canagasabapathy Visuvalingam Wigneswaran

The Tamil National Alliance is the premier political configuration of the Sri Lankan Tamils. The chief constituent of the TNA is the Ilankai Thamil Arasuk Katchi(ITAK) referred to in English as the Federal Party(FP). The TNA contests under the House symbol of the ITAK in elections. CV Wigneswaran contested the Northern Provincial Council elections in September 2013 as the chief ministerial candidate of the TNA. He contested as the ITAK candidate in Jaffna district with the backing of other TNA Constituents at that time namely the TELO, PLOTE,TULF and EPRLF.
Continue reading ‘How Sampanthan Made Wigneswaran The TNA Northern Chief Minister Candidate In 2013’ »

Group of Mostly Western Foreign Envoys Meeting Ousted Prime Minister Formally is Unprecedented and Unacceptable says Former Ambassador Tamara Kunanayakam.


Tamara Kunanayakam, Economist, Expert on international affairs, Former Ambassador/Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN at Geneva, Former Chairperson/Rapporteur of the UN Intergovernmental Working Group on the Right to Development yesterday asked why West had been silen on some grave wrongdoings of the ousted Premier Wickremesinghe.

Kunanayakam, was speaking at a briefing organized by Eliya Organization.
Eliya Organisation is headed by former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Tamara Kunanayakam said: “What is the explanation for the West’s silence on the postponement of local government elections for some three years and delays in holding Provincial Council elections, all under the Premiership of Ranil Wickremesinghe?

“What is the explanation for the West’s silence on the Central Bank-Perpetual Treasuries bond scams under Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Premiership when he was Minister in charge of the Central Bank and for which his close ally, Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran, has been held responsible and is evading arrest? The bond scams have been described as the biggest ever corruption scandal and biggest-ever cover-up in the history of Sri Lanka.

“Why has there been no call for credible investigations by the West on information of a plot to assassinate the President and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, a plot in which a Cabinet Minister is allegedly involved?”

Continue reading ‘Group of Mostly Western Foreign Envoys Meeting Ousted Prime Minister Formally is Unprecedented and Unacceptable says Former Ambassador Tamara Kunanayakam.’ »

The Speaker has the Constitutional Responsibility to the Nation to Summon Parliament While Informing the President It is Being Done to Prevent the President from Violating His Own Constitutional Responsibility.

By Prof. Saviri Goonesekere

The President and his lawyers have argued that the removal of the Prime Minister on 26. 10. 2018 in the aftermath of the collapse of the current coalition government was lawful under the Constitution of Sri Lanka. His subsequent appointment of a new PM and Cabinet at his individual discretion, is also represented as being lawful under the Constitution.

This has been challenged by others, who have used legal arguments to support their views. They have argued that with the collapse of the coalition there is a President, a sitting Prime Minister and Cabinet, without any identification of the government and PM in office, who succeeded the collapsed coalition government.

In short there is no lawful government in office, because there are institutional gaps.

This represents a fundamental division of legal opinion.

In these circumstances the President’s actions must be guided not just by what his own lawyers advise, but by his critically important duty to “respect and uphold the Constitution” (Art. 33 (1) (a) as amended by 19th Amendment).

Continue reading ‘The Speaker has the Constitutional Responsibility to the Nation to Summon Parliament While Informing the President It is Being Done to Prevent the President from Violating His Own Constitutional Responsibility.’ »

Instead of Opining Whether President’s Actions are Unconstitutional or not as an Attorney -General Ought to, Jayantha Jayasuriya Keeps Mum Saying Its “Inappropriate” to Comment.

By A special Correspondent

Advising one party whose position may be at odds with the President’s position could put the Attorney General in a pickle, which may explain why he has declined to give an opinion, lawyers told the Daily FT.

The experts said that, based on views expressed by President Sirisena and the letter from the Speaker querying the constitutionality of Wickremesinghe’s sacking, it would have been clear to the AG that they could be opposing parties.

However, experts added that, be that as it may, as a matter of propriety, the AG should advise the President of the unconstitutionality of his actions, and while presenting the position of the President to court (what the President claims and what he feels), the AG owes a duty of care to uphold the Constitution as all civil servants must – by stating to court the correct position under the Constitution (what the law is) without being ‘wishy-washy’ or trying to push clearly wrong arguments on constitutional interpretation just to keep his client happy.

Continue reading ‘Instead of Opining Whether President’s Actions are Unconstitutional or not as an Attorney -General Ought to, Jayantha Jayasuriya Keeps Mum Saying Its “Inappropriate” to Comment.’ »

Newly Appointed Finance Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa Wants to Move Away from Liberalisation Policies and Promote Populist,Protectionist Policies Including Farmer Subsidies,Tax Reduction and Fuel Price Formula Abolition.

By Uditha Jayasinghe

In a predictable policy U-turn, former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, who was appointed as Finance Minister by President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday, backed promoting populist and protectionist economic policies that would give subsidies to farmers, do away with the fuel formula and possibly reduce taxes.

Rajapaksa, addressing the staff of the Finance Ministry after assuming duties, also supported moving away from liberalisation policies championed by Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera under the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe Cabinet that focused on promoting exports of tradable goods, removing uncompetitive tariffs and formulating Free Trade Agreements. Fiscal consolidation measures that were spearheaded by Samaraweera to reduce Budget deficits were also criticised by Rajapaksa as having increased pressure on rural masses.

Continue reading ‘Newly Appointed Finance Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa Wants to Move Away from Liberalisation Policies and Promote Populist,Protectionist Policies Including Farmer Subsidies,Tax Reduction and Fuel Price Formula Abolition.’ »

Nailing Canards: Why President Sirisena’s Actions Remain Illegal, Unconstitutional, And Illegitimate

By

Dr.Asanga Welikala

There have been intense public debates over the meaning and interpretation of the Constitution, and especially the far-reaching changes introduced by the Nineteenth Amendment in 2015, since the dramatic and ongoing attempt at an unconstitutional transfer power that began on the evening of Friday 26th October. Unfortunately, the discussion has been clouded by the attempts of those who are trying to uphold the approach taken by Maithripala Sirisena and Mahinda Rajapaksa, to present arguments that are – at best – simply wrong, without any valid legal basis, or based on a lack of understanding of the Constitution – or at worst – motivated by a deliberate desire to lie, dissimulate, distort, and misinform the public.

Such attempts gather greater traction than they should in a context defined by a history of weak communication by the legally constituted government, a largely uncritical and unprofessional mainstream media, and an electorate that has been poorly informed about the major changes established by the Nineteenth Amendment in 2015 – a constitutional amendment that was enacted as a direct implementation of the historic mandate for democratisation and good governance given by 6.2 million Sri Lankans of all communities and classes at the presidential election of 8th January 2015.

The following is an attempt to identify some of these false arguments, and to present clear rebuttals to them based on what the Constitution actually provides, and on the principles that ought to inform the working of a democratic constitutional system that the people of Sri Lanka mandated in 2015.

Continue reading ‘Nailing Canards: Why President Sirisena’s Actions Remain Illegal, Unconstitutional, And Illegitimate’ »