{"id":87286,"date":"2026-03-10T18:18:12","date_gmt":"2026-03-10T22:18:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=87286"},"modified":"2026-03-10T22:55:34","modified_gmt":"2026-03-11T02:55:34","slug":"87286","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=87286","title":{"rendered":"The Dramatic Tale of Three Iranian Ships,US Belligerence and Sri Lanka\u2019s Humanitarian Approach While Delicately Balancing Neutrality and International Legality."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By Tharushi Weerasinghe <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The sinking of the IRIS Dena by a US submarine just 19 nautical miles from Sri Lanka\u2019s shore in its Exclusive Economic Zone has forced Colombo to navigate one of the most complex diplomatic and legal crises in its recent history, with pressure mounting from Washington not to repatriate Iranian survivors and a third Iranian vessel now docked in India.  <\/p>\n<p><strong>The vessels and its mission<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The three Iranian naval vessels at the centre of the crisis, IRIS Dena, IRIS Bushehr, and IRIS Lavan, had all been operating in the region following participation in a naval exercise in India. The IRIS Dena had departed Indian waters about a week before it was attacked, and was in transit through the Indian Ocean when the strike occurred.<\/p>\n<p>On February 26, Iran formally requested permission from Sri Lanka\u2019s Ministry of Foreign Affairs for three naval vessels to enter Sri Lankan ports between March 9 and 13, described as a visit to enhance bilateral cooperation. Sri Lankan authorities, however, took note that the vessels were already positioned close to, but outside, the country\u2019s national maritime zone. As President Anura Kumara Dissanayake later explained, a cooperation visit of this nature requires extensive formal procedures, and the government was still studying those procedures when events overtook the process.<\/p>\n<p>On February 27, Sri Lanka received a separate request: a sailor aboard the IRIS Bushehr, one of the vessels then near Sri Lankan waters, had been injured. The Sri Lanka Navy and Air Force responded on humanitarian grounds, bringing the injured sailor and an accompanying officer ashore and directing them to receive medical treatment.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>The attack: March 4<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In the early hours of March 4, Sri Lanka\u2019s Navy received a distress signal. Navy Spokesperson Commander Buddhika Sampath told the Sunday Times that the signal was received between 5. 05 a.m. and 5.10 a.m. A rescue mission was deployed from Galle harbour by 6 a.m. \u201cThe rescue vessels reached the survivors within a matter of minutes,\u201d he said, adding that the first naval officers on scene found only life rafts and oil spills. \u201cWe did not observe the ship or any wreckage,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The IRIS Dena had been struck approximately 19 nautical miles from the Port of Galle \u2014 outside Sri Lanka\u2019s 12-nautical-mile territorial sea, but within its Exclusive Economic Zone. The Sri Lanka Navy and Air Force launched a major rescue operation, recovering 32 survivors and 84 bodies, all of whom were brought ashore. The survivors are currently receiving treatment at Karapitiya Teaching Hospital.<\/p>\n<p>In its initial press briefing, the Sri Lanka Navy said it had no information on the nature of the attack or who carried it out. That changed only when United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth later publicly claimed responsibility, confirming that an American submarine had torpedoed and sunk the Iranian frigate. Deputy Minister of Defence Major General Aruna Jayasekara confirmed to the Sunday Times on Friday that there had been \u201cabsolutely no communication\u201d from the US government, by way of advance notice, explanation, or information-sharing, regarding the military operation. \u201cWe only knew what happened through the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth\u2019s briefing that was broadcast later, claiming responsibility for the attack,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The sinking is notable in historical terms: it is the first time since the end of the Second World War that a United States submarine has sunk an enemy vessel. Both the United Kingdom and Pakistan have sunk vessels using torpedoes in the intervening decades, but this marks a significant threshold for American naval engagement.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The IRIS Bushehr: A second crisis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Even as the rescue operation for survivors of the IRIS Dena was underway, a second Iranian vessel, the IRIS Bushehr, informed Sri Lanka\u2019s Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 4 that it was requesting permission to enter a Sri Lankan port on the 4th and 5th of March, after reporting engine damage. Sri Lanka\u2019s Foreign Minister entered into discussions with his Iranian counterpart, while the Iranian Embassy maintained continuous contact with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.<\/p>\n<p>The situation presented Sri Lanka with a genuine legal and diplomatic dilemma. As President Dissanayake outlined in a special media briefing on March 5, the government was required to carefully examine its obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Hague Convention of 1907, which govern how a neutral state may deal with a belligerent\u2019s naval vessel. \u201cThis is not an ordinary situation,\u201d the President said. \u201cA neutral state, a vessel belonging to one party to a conflict, and a request to enter our ports must be considered strictly in accordance with international conventions and international obligations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After negotiations between the vessel\u2019s captain and Sri Lanka Navy officers, and with agreement from all parties, Sri Lanka announced that it would evacuate the IRIS Bushehr\u2019s 208 crew members, comprising 53 officers, 84 cadet officers, 48 senior sailors and 23 sailors, bringing them ashore at Colombo Port. The vessel itself would not remain at Colombo, which serves as Sri Lanka\u2019s principal commercial harbour; instead, it was to be taken to the Port of Trincomalee under Sri Lankan naval escort, with a skeleton crew and Sri Lankan naval personnel on board.<\/p>\n<p>The Deputy Minister of Defence confirmed that responsibility for handling those aboard both vessels, the survivors from the IRIS Dena and the crew of the IRIS Bushehr, has since been transferred to the Sri Lanka Police under the Public Security Ministry.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The third vessel: IRIS Lavan docks in India<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A third vessel from the same Iranian naval deployment has meanwhile sought shelter elsewhere. Indian media reports, citing government sources, indicate that Iran approached India on February 28 seeking urgent permission for the IRIS Lavan to dock at Kochi after the vessel developed technical issues while in the region following the International Fleet Review. India approved on March 1, and the IRIS Lavan docked at Kochi on March 4, the same day the IRIS Dena was sunk. Its 183 crew members are currently being accommodated at naval facilities in the city.<\/p>\n<p>With the IRIS Dena destroyed, the IRIS Bushehr in Sri Lankan custody and the IRIS Lavan docked in Kochi, all three Iranian naval vessels from the same regional deployment are now accounted for across South Asian waters.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Washington pressures Colombo<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sri Lanka\u2019s handling of the crisis is now drawing direct pressure from the United States. According to an internal US State Department cable dated March 6, reported by Reuters, the US Embassy in Colombo has conveyed to Sri Lankan authorities that neither the survivors from the IRIS Dena nor the crew of the IRIS Bushehr should be repatriated to Iran. The cable also indicated that Sri Lanka should minimise any attempts by Iran to use the detained sailors for propaganda purposes.<\/p>\n<p>Sri Lanka\u2019s government has not publicly commented on the US request. The Deputy Minister of Defence insisted when questioned that Sri Lanka has not started any defence discussions and is continuing to follow its policy of neutrality.<\/p>\n<p>The Sunday Times also reached out to the US Embassy in Sri Lanka for confirmation and was directed to the United States Department of State Media Inquiries System, which is yet to respond.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Parliamentary dispute overpre-attack contact<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The events have also sparked controversy in Parliament. MP Mujibur Rahuman this week claimed that the IRIS Dena had arrived at the edge of Sri Lanka\u2019s maritime territory and requested permission to enter before the US attack, and that the government failed to respond. \u201cThe government of Sri Lanka did not respond, and while the vessel waited, they were attacked,\u201d he stated. Rahuman also alleged that Iran\u2019s Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Dr. Alireza Delkhosh, had confirmed that the Sri Lanka Navy Commander had personally requested the vessels to visit Sri Lanka, which was the original impetus for the deployment. <\/p>\n<p>The Sunday Times reached out to the Iranian Ambassador for clarification, but did not receive a response.<\/p>\n<p>The Ministry of Defence has flatly rejected these claims. Deputy Minister Jayasekara stated that there was \u201cabsolutely no communication\u201d from the IRIS Dena before the distress call received on the morning of March 4.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Questions of international law<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Admiral Priyantha Perera Retired, the 25th Commander of the Sri Lanka Navy, told the Sunday Times that the legal picture, while complex, points in a relatively clear direction under existing international instruments, even as it raises uncomfortable questions about the erosion of the international rules-based order.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn an international conflict, whether it is a declared war or not, when we know there is a war, there are parties, and there are rules,\u201d Admiral Perera said. \u201cUnder the laws of war and engagement, including the Geneva Conventions, the Hague Convention of 1907, and the San Remo Manual, an engaging belligerent has legitimate targets. These include enemy government vessels, coast guard vessels, navy ships, and the like, generally on the high seas. As long as the target is on the high seas, the United States can lawfully attack it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The IRIS Dena had departed Indian waters before the attack. At the point it was struck, it was beyond the 12-nautical-mile territorial sea limit and therefore legally on the high seas \u2014 irrespective of being within Sri Lanka\u2019s EEZ. \u201cInternational law regards the EEZ as high seas for navigation and safety,\u201d Admiral Perera noted. \u201cThe United States was not required to inform the Sri Lankan government.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He explained that neutral states, such as Sri Lanka and India, have specific obligations when belligerent vessels seek access to their ports. \u201cWhen an actively engaged state enters a neutral port, a 24-hour rule applies \u2014 the vessel can request assistance such as replenishment and repairs, but must leave. Repairs to elevate fighting capacity are illegal. Repairs may require more time, but that requires a separate understanding,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of the IRIS Bushehr, Trincomalee was identified as the most appropriate option. \u201cThe ship went there without the Iranian crew, which is better for safety. Once in our waters, the vessel is under our control, and no one can attack it, given that the intention was clear for the reason of the diverted passage,\u201d he said. If the ship fails to leave within 24 hours or a reasonable time thereof, the ship should not be allowed to leave until the end of the ongoing conflict.<\/p>\n<p>On the question of innocent passage, whether the Iranian vessels could have transited Sri Lanka\u2019s territorial sea for safety, Admiral Perera was clear that innocent passage exists only for traversing the Teritorial Sea on a designated passage unimpeded and expeditiously as to proceed to or from port facilities and Internal Waters of that Coastal State. This reflects well that no belligerent vessel could seek refuge under the concept of innocent passage to avoid pursuit and attack. \u201cFor naval vessels, there are conditions under innocent passage: no surveillance, no weapons activated, and submarines must surface, among others. You can not divert into a territorial sea for safety. That is not how innocent passage works,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>On conditions that apply for the rescued Iranian naval personnel of Dena and the crew of Bushehr, if that ship is held in our port it cannot be repatriated until the end of the war.<\/p>\n<p>Another senior naval commander,who wished to remain anonymous, pointed to a deeper and more troubling dimension of the crisis. The theory of neutrality, he explained, operates formally only in the context of a declared war, and the United States has not declared war against Iran. \u201cWe are not a party to this conflict. America has not formally declared war against Iran. Under the American Constitution, it is Congress that declares war, not the President. The Congress did not approve this action. In that sense, it is an illegal war,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>He was direct about what that means in practice. \u201cAmerica has, in its own national defence strategy, signalled that it no longer wishes to be bound by the international rules-based order; it will do what benefits itself. Multilateralism is no longer a priority. <\/p>\n<p>This is an enormous problem for countries like Sri Lanka, because it survives and is protected by those rules. The attack does not come under a formal war action; the United States considers every Iranian target a legitimate target. There is no one to hold them to account. They did not even inform Congress, let alone their allies, their partners, or Sri Lanka.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In a pointed observation, he noted that Washington did not inform India either, a significant omission, given the close military partnership between the two countries, including through the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (the Quad, comprising the US, India, Australia and Japan). \u201cIn the Indian Ocean, India should have been America\u2019s main partner. That gives rise to a serious question: this happened in India\u2019s backyard. We talked about maritime surveillance and domain awareness, and we could not even detect a submarine coming and attacking a ship,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>He added that this geopolitical realignment has consequences extending beyond the immediate incident. China, Europe and India have all signalled that the rules-based international order remains important to them. \u201cAmerica has said it is to their disadvantage, so they changed. That is now a major issue for every country that depends on international law for its security and sovereignty, and Sri Lanka is one of them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Colombo\u2019s stance: Neutrality and humanity<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>President Dissanayake, addressing the nation at a special briefing at the Presidential Secretariat on March 5, was emphatic that Sri Lanka would not allow itself to be drawn into the conflict on either side. \u201cWe shall not, under any circumstances, permit our land territory, maritime zones, or airspace to be utilised in a biased manner by any nation engaged in a conflict, nor in any manner that inflicts harm upon another nation,\u201d he said. \u201cNo matter what external outcries or pressures may exist, we do not panic or act recklessly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The President called on all parties to the conflict to demonstrate a commitment to peace. \u201cWhat the world urgently needs today is peace. People are dying, and there is a risk of a severe global economic crisis,\u201d he said. \u201cAs a state, we are ready to extend our support to every step taken towards that end.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As of Friday, the sailors and officers from both vessels remain in Sri Lanka. The IRIS Bushehr was slated to be moved to Trincomalee but was still in the Colombo Port for \u2018repairs\u2019 as of Saturday afternoon, according to internal sources. The question of what happens next, to the crew, the ship, and Sri Lanka\u2019s carefully maintained neutrality, remains unresolved, with Washington pressing hard for Colombo not to return the Iranians home.<\/p>\n<p><em>Courtesy: Sunday Times<\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"tweetbutton87286\" class=\"tw_button\" style=\"float:right;margin-left:10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdbsjeyaraj.com%2Fdbsj%2F%3Fp%3D87286&amp;text=The%20Dramatic%20Tale%20of%20Three%20Iranian%20Ships%2CUS%20Belligerence%20and%20Sri%20Lanka%E2%80%99s%20Humanitarian%20Approach%20While...%20&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal\" class=\"twitter-share-button\"  style=\"width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-tweet-button\/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Tharushi Weerasinghe The sinking of the IRIS Dena by a US submarine just 19 nautical miles from Sri Lanka\u2019s shore in its Exclusive Economic Zone has forced Colombo to navigate one of the most complex diplomatic and legal crises in its recent history, with pressure mounting from Washington not to repatriate Iranian survivors and &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=87286\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading &lsquo;The Dramatic Tale of Three Iranian Ships,US Belligerence and Sri Lanka\u2019s Humanitarian Approach While Delicately Balancing Neutrality and International Legality.&rsquo; &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87286"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=87286"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":87289,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87286\/revisions\/87289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=87286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=87286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=87286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}