{"id":70098,"date":"2020-09-04T22:38:30","date_gmt":"2020-09-05T03:38:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=70098"},"modified":"2020-09-04T22:42:00","modified_gmt":"2020-09-05T03:42:00","slug":"attempt-by-gang-of-four-to-remove-thurairajasingham-from-gen-secy-post-through-no-confidence-motion-foiled-at-itak-committee-meeting-in-vavuniya","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=70098","title":{"rendered":"Attempt by \u201cGang of Four\u201d to Remove Thurairajasingham From Gen-Secy Post Through No Confidence Motion  Foiled At ITAK  Committee Meeting in Vavuniya"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By<\/p>\n<p>D.B.S.Jeyaraj<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A<\/strong> concerted move by five (four+One) stalwarts of the Ilankai Thamil Arasuk Katchi(ITAK) \u2013 the chief constituent of the Tamil National Alliance(TNA) &#8211;  to remove  the party General- Secretary K. Thurairajasingham from his post  through a no confidence motion  ended in a dismal failure at a conclave held in Vavuniya on  Saturday August 29th 2020. In spite of a lot of sound and fury being  emitted by unruly members at the gathering, the meeting ended on a conciliatory note with a motion of censure  being passed against the Gen-secy  expressing disapproval for  adopting  incorrect procedure in nominating a national list MP to Parliament on behalf of the TNA.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Screenshot_20200830-0946362.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Screenshot_20200830-0946362-600x514.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"514\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-70103\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Screenshot_20200830-0946362-600x514.png 600w, https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Screenshot_20200830-0946362-300x257.png 300w, https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Screenshot_20200830-0946362.png 720w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The  Central Working Committee (Mathiya Seyal Kuzhu) Meeting of the ITAK known in English as the Federal Party(FP) was held  from  10. 30 am to 5.30 pm on Saturday at the Princess Rose Hotel in Kurumankaadu, Vavuniya.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe meeting presided over by ITAK president Somasundaram Senathirajah known as \u201cMaavai\u201d Senathirajah had  an attendance of over 50 persons. These included TNA Parliamentary Group leader and  veteran Trincomalee district MP Rajavarothayam Sampanthan and other ITAK MP\u201ds, Ex-provincial councillors and local authority representatives.<\/p>\n<p>The meeting had aroused much interest and concern as moves were  initiated by elements close to ITAK leader \u201cMaavai\u201d Senathirajah to  remove the ITAK General-Secretary Krishnapillai Thurairajasingham by passing a no confidence motion against him. Senathirajah had accused Thurairajasingham of acting unilaterally by nominating Thavarasah Kalaiarasan  hailing from the Amparai district as  TNA national list MP without his knowledge. Although Senathirajah took umbrage at  himself being allegedly kept in the dark by Thurairajasingham, it was well known that the actual reason for the ITAK president being miffed was at his not being appointed  mational list MP. Senathirajah who had been elected to Parliament from Jaffna  district since 2000 was defeated at the last elections coming sixth among TNA  candidates receiving preference votes.<\/p>\n<p><strong><br \/>\n&#8220;Gang of Four&#8221; Plus Another<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Four important ITAK officials &#8211; all of them aligned to Senathirajah &#8211; gave notice of a no confidence motion against ITAK general secretary Krishnapillai Thurairajasingham. The wording of the motion called for immediate removal of Thurairajasingham from the office of General through a vote . The four signatories &#8211; dubbed as the \u201cgang of four\u201d by wags -were former Northern Provincial Council Chaiman CVK Sivagnam,   ITAK party treasurer K. Kanagasabapathy, ITAK Mayor of Jaffna Emmanuel Arnold and Ex-Northern provincial councillor Paranjothy.. Subsequently a fifth person, ITAK Committee member  Prof. Kuhapalan also added his signature.  Sivagnanam and Kanagasabapathy are regarded as the right and left hands of \u201cMaavai\u201d  Senathirajah.<\/p>\n<p> Interestingly enough it was Sivagnanam and Kanagasabapathy who had gone to Trincomalee to meet Sampanthan and urge that Senathirajah be appointed as National list MP because the ITAK Jaffna branch had passed a resolution to that effect. Furthermore it was two other signatories Paranjithy and Kuhapalan who had propsed and seconded the resolution calling for Senathirajah&#8217;s nomination. Now four persons who  were deeply involved in the move to get Senathirajah appointed as MP  were trying to move a vote of no confidence motion alleging improper conduct on the part of the General secretary. Having failed in their attempt to secure the MP post for Senathirajah,they were downplaying their role in that sordid exercise and were now diverting the issue by ganging up against Thurairajasingham and extracting revenge for thwarting their plans.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Chief Strategist C.V.K. Sivagnanam<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Senathirajah\u2019s chief strategist C.V.K. Sivagnanam  had been  communicating with members of the central committee in a bid to canvass support for the no confidence motion. He had also told sections of  the Tamil media that the no confidence motion was being brought against the Gen \u2013 secy  for  acting unilaterally  without discussing the matter with the ITAK leader Senathirajah. It is learnt however that Sivagnanam had realised the motion against Thurairajasingham succeeding at a vote was doubtful because the \u201csilent majority\u201d of Central Working Committee members was not supportive.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796367285.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796367285-600x338.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-70109\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796367285-600x338.jpg 600w, https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796367285-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796367285.jpg 720w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>When the meeting commenced ITAK treasurer and   co-signatory , Kanagasabapathy began reading the text of the motion. ITAK\/TNA spokesperson and Jaffna district  MP Mathiaparanan Abraham Sumanthiran  raised an objection to the motion being  presented for a vote at the Central Working committee meeting. Sumanthiran pointed out that the Gen \u2013 Secy had been elected by the  \u201cPodhu Sabhai\u201d  (General Council) and ratified at the party convention. The Central Working Committee had no authority to remove the  Gen-secy. It was the  General Council that could remove him. As such the No Confidence Motion  could  not be taken up at this meeting.<\/p>\n<p>MA Sumanthiran also pointed out  that the ITAK party  Constitution  had stipulated that the Central Working Committee  could have 41 members only.  These consisted of representatives elected by each district and ex-officio members. However in recent times the ITAK leader had acted arbitrarily and appointed more persons to the committee. This exceeded fifty in number. Sumanthiran who is a president\u2019s counsel  said that if the no confidence motion issue went to court &#8211; as it would very likely \u2013 then the courts would  have to ascertain whether the Central Working Committee was constituted properly  according to the Constitution. Since the members present exceeded the  stipulated the  prescribed  number of 41, the courts may not recognize the legality of any decision in this regard said Sumanthiran.<\/p>\n<p>The objection raised by Sumanthiran and the  points mentioned by him had a dampening effect on the proponents of the no confidence motion. Although the \u201crowdy\u201d sections kept protesting, the mastermind behind the motion, CVK Sivagnanam realised the gravity of the situation. CVK  Sivagnanam is  one of the two senior vice presidents of the ITAK although the party constitution has provision for only one.  <\/p>\n<p>The politically astute Sivagnanam then thought on his feet and switched gears. Sivagnanam abandoned the idea of a no confidence motion and suggested that a vote of censure  expressing disapproval of the Gen \u2013 Secy\u2019s conduct be passed instead. This was exuberantly welcomed by Senathirajah\u2019s \u201cHurra boys\u201d whose appreciation of the difference between a no confidence motion and censure motion was minimal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Beleaguered General &#8211; Secretary<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There was however much debate and discussion over the issue. The gathering   gradually split into three broad factions. One  was  supportive of Thurairajasingham while another was hostile. The third and comparatively large faction kept silent but it appeared that their sympathies lay with the beleaguered General Secretary<\/p>\n<p>Among those who were supportive of Thurairajasingham were TNA leader R.Sampanthan, S. Shritharan, MA Sumanthiran and \u201cfresher\u201dMP  Rasamanickam Rajaputhiran Shanakkiyan. Among others who spoke in similar vein were former  Northern provincial minister Dr. P. Sathiyalingam. Those speaking against Thurairajasingham were Senathirajah along with the \u201cgang of four \u201c, ex-MP and media \u201cMudalaali\u201d Saravanapavan and Colombo based lawyer KV Thavarasa.<\/p>\n<p>Two important  facts came to light during the verbal onslaughts. The newly appointed National list MP Kalaiarasan  shocked the gathering when he said that he was resigning as it was being alleged that he had been made an MP through improper procedures. Kalaiarasan said  that neither he nor the Tamils of Amparai district were prepared to be insulted in this manner. This led to  Senathirajah and his acolytes assuring and re-assuring Kalaiarasan that  there was no improper procedure in his being appointed MP. They said Kalaisrasan fully deserved it and that none were objecting to the manner in which he was appointed by the Gen \u2013 secy. Their objection was only  against  Thurairajasingham because he had  not discussed the matter with ITAK Leader Senathirajah.<\/p>\n<p>Thus Kalaiarasan\u2019s righteous indignation at being insulted and the response it elicited proved the point that there was no improper procedure adopted by the General Secretary as alleged in the draft no confidence motion. This left only the charge about  Thurairajasingham  not  discussing the matter with Senathirajah. This allegation too was disproved when Thurairajasingham spoke out.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cKoochalidum Kumbal\u201d(Howling Mob)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p> The former Batticaloa district Parliamentarian and ex-provincial minister spoke amidst  hooting and heckling by the  \u201cKoochalidum Kumbal\u201d (Howling mob) that was hostile to him. Many of these  youths were involved in the abortive attempt to invade the main election counting centre for Jaffna district located  at the Jaffna Central College premises. They were dispersed by the Special Task Force and Police Riot Squad then. <\/p>\n<p>Despite the disturbances Thurairajasingham related his side of the story and stated clearly that he had  not acted unilaterally without discussing with Senathirajah. Thurairajasingham revealed that he had  spoken  on three occasions with Senathirajah about the national list MP matter and that the ITAK Leader  had indeed been informed of Kalaiarasan being nominated. This was not denied by Senathirajah. <\/p>\n<p>Thus the  wind was taken out of the sails of the charge that  Thurairajasingham had not discussed the matter with Senathirajah. The only \u201coffence\u201d committed by the Gen -Secy was not keeping Senathirajah informed that the official letter  nominating Kalaiarasan had been sent to the Election Commission.<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter the envisaged motion of censure lost much of its proposed sting. The motion was drafted by CVK Sivagnanam who consulted lawyers Sumanthiran and Thavarasah while doing so. Finally the whittled down toothless motion reprimanding Thurairajasingham mildly for the lapse in informing  the ITAK Leader  was passed. It appeared that the mountains had laboured and brought forth a mouse.  Despite the  attempts to unseat him,  Krishnapillai Thurairajasingham will continue to function as the ITAK General \u2013 Secretary! <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796355451.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796355451-600x338.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-70108\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796355451-600x338.jpg 600w, https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796355451-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/FB_IMG_1598796355451.jpg 699w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>What is saddening and maddening about this matter is that the Central Working Committee of the  chief political party representing the Sri Lankan Tamil people had devoted its time and energy to such a trivial and ephemeral issue such as this at a time when the Tamils in particular and the minorities in general face a bleak future in the Island after the Presidential poll of 2019 and Parliamentary elections. Nero at least fiddled making music while Rome burnt. But the ITAK members keep attacking  each other while storm clouds loom large on the political horizon.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Firecracker Fizzled Into Damp Squib<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The expected firecracker of a no confidence motion fizzling out into a damp squib was not the only issue at the Vavuniya General Working Committee meeting.  Much heat rather than light  was generated at the conclave. Those  matters can be related on another occasion.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>D.B.S.Jeyaraj can be reached at dbsjeyaraj@yahoo.com <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"tweetbutton70098\" class=\"tw_button\" style=\"float:right;margin-left:10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdbsjeyaraj.com%2Fdbsj%2F%3Fp%3D70098&amp;text=Attempt%20by%20%E2%80%9CGang%20of%20Four%E2%80%9D%20to%20Remove%20Thurairajasingham%20From%20Gen-Secy%20Post%20Through%20No%20Confidence%20Motion%20...%20&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal\" class=\"twitter-share-button\"  style=\"width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-tweet-button\/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By D.B.S.Jeyaraj A concerted move by five (four+One) stalwarts of the Ilankai Thamil Arasuk Katchi(ITAK) \u2013 the chief constituent of the Tamil National Alliance(TNA) &#8211; to remove the party General- Secretary K. Thurairajasingham from his post through a no confidence motion ended in a dismal failure at a conclave held in Vavuniya on Saturday August &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=70098\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading &lsquo;Attempt by \u201cGang of Four\u201d to Remove Thurairajasingham From Gen-Secy Post Through No Confidence Motion  Foiled At ITAK  Committee Meeting in Vavuniya&rsquo; &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[27],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70098"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=70098"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70112,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70098\/revisions\/70112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=70098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=70098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=70098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}