{"id":65768,"date":"2019-09-28T20:55:39","date_gmt":"2019-09-29T00:55:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=65768"},"modified":"2019-09-28T20:55:39","modified_gmt":"2019-09-29T00:55:39","slug":"is-the-killing-of-civilian-tamils-during-the-rajapaksa-decade-to-be-reckoned-as-a-necessary-evil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=65768","title":{"rendered":"Is the Killing of Civilian Tamils During the Rajapaksa Decade to Be Reckoned as a Necessary Evil?"},"content":{"rendered":"


\nBy<\/p>\n

Kishali Pinto Jayawardene<\/strong><\/p>\n

Two manifestly glorious ironies occurred this week. A former President cautioned against a return to what he termed \u2018the Premadasa era\u2019 and a former Chief Justice lamented that, during the \u2018yahapalanaya\u2019 years, the independence of the Sri Lankan judiciary had been lost.<\/p>\n

Strange logic and stranger contradictions<\/strong><\/p>\n

These claims may have been dismissed with nary a scornful sniff if it was not for the stunningly hypocritical context in which they were made. Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa\u2019s reference to the \u2018tyre killings\u2019 of Sinhalese youth during the Ranasinghe Premadasa Presidency at an event hosted by local entrepreneurs in Colombo drew, on predictable cue, cries of assent from an adoring crowd. But these repeated references by the former President sharpens a major paradox of which surely he must be all too aware.<\/p>\n

The pointing of one finger at killings of civilian Sinhalese during the quelling of the second Southern insurrection during Ranasinghe Premadasa\u2019s time as inhumane butchery invariably results in four fingers of that same accusing hand being directed backwards at the Rajapaksas themselves. So when civilian Tamils were killed during the Rajapaksa decade, was this reckoned to be a necessary evil? <\/p>\n

Legend has it that when King Dhutugemunu was mourning over the killing of the invader, King Elara and hundreds of Chola soldiers, his sages came to him and asked him why he was disturbed. On being told the reason, they asked him not to grieve, saying \u2018O King, do not be sad, only one and a half persons have died.\u2019 Is this the logic employed to explain the strange contradiction whereby a politician can wax eloquent on \u2018Southern\u2019 killings as it were, but summarily disregard their \u2018Northern\u2019 equivalent? Let us not forget further that the Rajapaksa Presidency was marked quite extraordinarily by the killings of editors, journalists and dissenters and for good measure, anyone who offended the \u2018first family\u2019, (of which the most egregious example was the murder of ruggerite Wasim Thajudeen). As the former President lectures to the public regarding \u2018the Premadasa era\u2019, he may well keep in mind that this is a loathsomely slippery slope that he is on.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

A Chief Justice and the ironies of his time<\/strong><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, ex-Chief Justice Sarath Silva expostulated at a \u2018Viyath Maga\u2019 conference this Wednesday that the facade of good governance has eroded Sri Lanka\u2019s judicial independence \u2018entrenched since colonial times.\u2019 Quite apart from his apparent amnesia regarding the disgraceful impeachment of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake by the Rajapaksas, this warning is hilarious given the International Bar Association\u2019s 2001 excellent assessment of multifarious assaults on the judicial institution under the turbulent Silva Court, (\u2018Sri Lanka; Failing to Protect the Rule of Law and the Independence of the Judiciary\u2019, 2001). <\/p>\n

That report particularly centred on the undermining of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). Eminent international jurists pointedly observed that they were, \u2018very troubled to hear complaints regarding the conduct of the JSC, disturbed to learn that judges are being threatened with removal from the bench, transfer to distant courts and demotion, and that these threats have been carried out in some instances\u2026(and) appalled that judges were fearful of meeting the delegation for fear of repercussions\u2019 (at page 34).<\/p>\n

The IBA report is just one of many other similar assessments at the time. Interestingly, the former Chief Justice\u2019s remarks this week were apparently occasioned by the recent scandal over the taping of a phone conversation between the second most senior law officer of the Department of the Attorney General and a suspect in the controversial Avant Garde case. This, as in many other instances, beats a trail to the door of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa\u2019s brother, onetime Secretary, Ministry of Defence and now Presidential candidate of the \u2018Pohottuwa\u2019 party, Gotabaya Rajapaksa at whose office, the ex-Chief Justice held his press conference. In this conversation, the law officer who is now reportedly interdicted, is recorded as saying that she can both \u2018make the law and break the law.\u2019<\/p>\n

As insensibly shocking and exceedingly distasteful as this may be, was this not precisely what had been happening during previous decades, in the inner sanctum of the Attorney General\u2019s Department as well as (after 1999), even by the Bench? No one was, to be brutally frank, foolish enough to be caught on tape in this way but the subversion was patently clear, nonetheless. To cite these numerous instances would take far more than the limited spaces of a newspaper column. To that extent and despite acknowledged aberrations, restoring a measure of public respect to Sri Lanka\u2019s judicial and prosecutorial arms has been a signal achievement of \u2018yahapalanaya\u2019 rule. Much more has to be done but at least a start was made.<\/p>\n

Attitudinal changes between then and now<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yet as this peculiar Presidential race counts down to its nail biting climax, there is no shortage of idiocies. Chief among these is the palpable dithering of those who unhesitatingly accepted the candidature of Sarath Fonseka in 2010 and of a (relatively unknown) Maithripala Sirisena in 2014 as the political face leading the anti-Rajapaksa campaign at the polls. As they stammer and stutter at a Sajith Premadasa Presidential candidacy, holding forth on \u2018lack of experience\u2019, \u2018lack of national stature\u2019 \u2018lack of maturity\u2019 etc, legitimate questions arise.<\/p>\n

In 2010, the common candidate was a former Army Commander with a fraught record of complicity (taken at its best) in gross human rights abuses and who, moreover, was singularly unable to keep his unruly tongue in check. Even so, he did not meet the barrage of hostility now directed at the younger Premadasa by a few \u2018progressives.\u2019 Why this sharp attitudinal change between then and now, pray? It does not need remarkable mental agility to answer that question. Unlike in 2010 and 2014, leader of the UNP, Ranil Wickremesinghe cannot be safely presumed to be the virtual power on the throne with a Premadasa candidacy. Hence we see the lamentations.<\/p>\n

That said and to be clear, this is not to be blind to risks attending a Premadasa Presidency but to pinpoint hypocrisies that stare at us. Certainly, to bewail the poor choices before the electorate is to state the obvious. It is also to reiterate that much of this is due to the uncritical \u2018co-opting\u2019 of \u2018yahapalanaya\u2019 voices into Government ranks in 2015 with consequent failure to speak out when things went clearly wrong.<\/p>\n

A signal consideration that must weigh more than others<\/strong><\/p>\n

Indeed, the paucity of this country\u2019s intellectual leadership is reflected not only in the candidates of political parties but also in the clownish lineup of \u2018independents\u2019 basking in banal rhetoric even as they scuttle around posing for publicity. The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna\u2019s third front has an exceedingly long way more to go in this Presidential poll even though it may certainly be to the good if it gets more parliamentary seats at the general elections that will follow next year.<\/p>\n

In short and as reflected on previously, Sri Lanka does not have the luxury of choices between \u2018better\u2019 or \u2018best\u2019 candidates in these upcoming Presidential polls. The greater enemy remains the same, in fact, now more so. The \u2018Pohottuwa\u2019 candidate\u2019s record, besides infamously chequered, is framed by war mongering rascally Viyath Maga types that surround him. Some openly advocate the death penalty for \u2018anti-patriots.\u2019 The prospect of such malcontents frothing at the mouth being thrust into executive office is truly nightmarish.<\/p>\n

Absent a significant change in that ugly posturing, that potential great danger must surely precede each and every other consideration.<\/p>\n

Courtesy:Sunday Times<\/em><\/p>\n

Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Kishali Pinto Jayawardene Two manifestly glorious ironies occurred this week. A former President cautioned against a return to what he termed \u2018the Premadasa era\u2019 and a former Chief Justice lamented that, during the \u2018yahapalanaya\u2019 years, the independence of the Sri Lankan judiciary had been lost. Strange logic and stranger contradictions These claims may have …<\/p>\n

Continue reading ‘Is the Killing of Civilian Tamils During the Rajapaksa Decade to Be Reckoned as a Necessary Evil?’ »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65768"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=65768"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65768\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65769,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65768\/revisions\/65769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=65768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=65768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=65768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}