{"id":61660,"date":"2018-11-13T20:21:47","date_gmt":"2018-11-14T00:21:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=61660"},"modified":"2018-11-13T20:21:47","modified_gmt":"2018-11-14T00:21:47","slug":"nimal-siripala-de-silva-says-request-will-be-made-to-appoint-a-full-bench-of-9-to-11-supreme-court-judges-to-determine-final-ruling-on-fundamental-rights-petition-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=61660","title":{"rendered":"Nimal Siripala de Silva  Says Request Will be Made to Appoint a Full Bench of 9 to 11 Supreme Court Judges  To Determine Final Ruling on Fundamental Rights Petition Cases."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By<\/p>\n<p>Lahiru Pothmulla<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The government yesterday maintained that the Supreme Court\u2019s interim order does not mean that the dissolution of parliament has been cancelled and said that it would request for a full-judge bench to hear the case.<\/p>\n<p>Addressing a hurriedly called news briefing last night at the Prime Minister\u2019s Office, Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva said respondents have a right to request for a full-judge bench comprising nine to 11 Judges to hear a case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPeople should note that the Supreme Court has not yet made a final decision on the gazette issued by the President dissolving parliament. The final ruling will be made on December 7. There is no finality in the matter as of yet,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>He said they were waiting for the court ruling and also fighting hard to go for an election. \u201cWe will abide by the Supreme Court\u2019s decision,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Minister Siripala said there were misconception that Speaker Karu Jayasuriya can appoint a new Prime Minister by reconvening parliament. Under the Constitution, only the President can appoint a Premier or other ministers, he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEven if the Speaker appoints a purported Prime Minister, the appointment is not valid. If the Opposition parties aspire to remove Mahinda Rajapaksa from the Prime Minister post, they will have to bring in a no-confidence motion (NCM) against him. The NCM has to be included in the order book for five days, taken up for a debate followed by a vote. This is the only way available to remove a Premier,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Minister Susil Premajayantha said no one has challenged in the Supreme Court the gazette issued by the President appointing Mr. Rajapaksa as the Premier and therefore, there is no impact on the Premiership by the interim order.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Minister Dinesh Gunawardana said only the gazette which was issued dissolving parliament has been suspended and that it had no effect on the election which is scheduled to be held in January. <\/p>\n<div id=\"tweetbutton61660\" class=\"tw_button\" style=\"float:right;margin-left:10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdbsjeyaraj.com%2Fdbsj%2F%3Fp%3D61660&amp;text=Nimal%20Siripala%20de%20Silva%20%20Says%20Request%20Will%20be%20Made%20to%20Appoint%20a%20Full%20Bench%20of%209%20to%2011%20Supreme%20Court%20Judges%20%20To...%20&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal\" class=\"twitter-share-button\"  style=\"width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-tweet-button\/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Lahiru Pothmulla The government yesterday maintained that the Supreme Court\u2019s interim order does not mean that the dissolution of parliament has been cancelled and said that it would request for a full-judge bench to hear the case. Addressing a hurriedly called news briefing last night at the Prime Minister\u2019s Office, Minister Nimal Siripala de &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=61660\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading &lsquo;Nimal Siripala de Silva  Says Request Will be Made to Appoint a Full Bench of 9 to 11 Supreme Court Judges  To Determine Final Ruling on Fundamental Rights Petition Cases.&rsquo; &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61660"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=61660"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61660\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61661,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61660\/revisions\/61661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=61660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=61660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=61660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}