{"id":36718,"date":"2014-12-29T00:36:03","date_gmt":"2014-12-29T05:36:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=36718"},"modified":"2014-12-29T01:41:59","modified_gmt":"2014-12-29T06:41:59","slug":"i-regard-mahinda-rajapaksa-as-a-tragic-anti-hero-scorned-by-the-hypocritical-colombo-elite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=36718","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;I Regard Mahinda Rajapaksa as a Tragic Anti-Hero Scorned by the Hypocritical Colombo Elite&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><br \/>\nBy<\/p>\n<p>DR DAYAN JAYATILLEKA<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a consistent supporter of the tragic hero and the anti-hero, and as a Lankan, in the battle between Rama and Ravana, I support and defend Ravana. I\u2019m on Ravana\u2019s side; never Vibheenshana\u2019s. That is why I supported Premadasa and that\u2019s why I support Mahinda.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/archives\/36718\/mr-dj-122814\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-36728\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/MR-DJ-122814-600x542.jpg\" alt=\"MR DJ 122814\" width=\"600\" height=\"542\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-36728\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As my dear friend Rajiva Wijesinha would recall, I have, even at my most acerbically critical of the policies, ideological doctrine, structures, policy process and personalities of Govt and State, always and explicitly exempted Mahinda Rajapaksa from that critique, except for his sins of omission. This is not only in my public pronouncements, but in private conversation and on social occasions.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nAs such I have never advocated the defeat\/removal of Mahinda Rajapaksa and would have done so only if it represented a step forward, which would have been the case ONLY with a Sajith-Karu ticket (i.e. with Sajith or Karu as candidate, and the other as PM). Even then, as I told Mr. Karu Jayasuriya months ago, I stand opposed in principle to the abolition of the executive presidential system and the handover of power to the parliament.<\/p>\n<p>I have also been also opposed, publicly, to the replacement or dilution of the electoral system of proportional representation by a predominantly first-past the post \u2018mixed\u2019 system.<\/p>\n<p>At no time would I have thought positively or charitably of a post-Mahinda dispensation in which the dominant personalities were Ranil and CBK. I regard such a prospect as a dangerously reactionary retrogression.<\/p>\n<p>I agree with the lucid reading that emerges from Tamara Kunanayakam&#8217;s piece in the Daily Mirror, re-posted by DBS Jeyaraj under the telling caption (excerpted from the text) \u201cA Vote for Sirisena is a Vote for Ranil&#8221;. I did hope that the Maithri accord with the JHU offered the opportunity of a mid-course correction, effecting a shift from abolition to the slimming down of the Exec Presidential system, and I said this to Maithri at our discussion on December 7th (on the evening of my lunchtime conversation with President Rajapaksa), but that hope was belied with his Dec 10th Human Rights Day speech to the Civil Society conclave, the Maithri Manifesto (p. 14 of which reiterates in bold type and a box, \u2018the abolition of the executive presidential system\u2019) and Ranil&#8217;s exegesis at the recent Business Forum.<\/p>\n<p>I have been totally against the abolition of the executive presidency, and totally for its retention in modified form (with the restoration of the 17th amendment). Even in the years of armed radical left opposition to the Jayewardene regime, for which I was indicted under the PTA and the Emergency, the executive presidency was never a target of our political or ideological attack.<\/p>\n<p>I am acutely aware that almost all left\/progressive administrations in Latin America and elsewhere are supporters and incumbents of executive Presidential systems. The executive presidency was the product or by-product of revolutions generated by progressive political thought, both liberal-bourgeois and radical, and is therefore in evidence in those societies with a revolutionary political tradition: USA, France, Russia and China. By contrast, the parliamentary model is that of Britain with its comparatively un-revolutionary, conservative tradition.  <\/p>\n<p>It was clear to me by Dec 10th 2014, three days after my discussion with Maithri, that the fast-track (100 day) surrender of executive power and authority was a serious commitment and that we shall find ourselves in a situation in which the most powerful person in the country is not Maithripala, but precisely Ranil or CBK.<\/p>\n<p>Given my long held and articulated views, I have two major reasons\u2014(a) the Exec Presidential system and (b) the RW+CBK bloc&#8211;to support Mahinda Rajapaksa as the lesser evil. As for Gotabhaya, while my policy criticisms of him remain, at least he is indubitably a patriot, unlike the pro-Western appeasers of fascist separatism, Ranil and Chandrika, who will rule the roost after Maithri abolishes the exec presidential system and abdicates power to parliament and the Cabinet on\/by April 20th.  <\/p>\n<p>How can anyone find surprising my decision to oppose an outcome in which Ranil Wickremesinghe the official representative of the global Right, the International Democratic Union headed by the US Republicans and the British Conservatives, emerges a key decision maker, while Mahinda Rajapaksa, a staunch advocate of national sovereignty, is sent packing?<\/p>\n<p>My critique of Ranil has remained consistent since the day in the late 1990s that Ranil linked up with the IDU and shifted the UNP\u2019s stance on the LTTE in line with the Liam Fox agreement. Rajiva would agree that Ranil has been pretty consistently positioned (except during the Premadasa presidency and its immediate aftermath) on the ideological and programmatic rightwing of the right-of-center UNP. It is Rajiva who most memorably reminds us of Ranil\u2019s conduct during the days of JR Jayewardene; conduct which appalled their distinguished uncle, Bishop Lakshman Wickremesinghe. Luckily for him, he passed away before Batalanda.<\/p>\n<p>As for the Foreign Ministry and foreign policy, I\u2019d rather take my chances with Mahinda and GL, &#8212; and yes, even with Gota in the mix\u2014rather than with Mangala Samaraweera under Ranil or CBK, especially since the Maithri manifesto fails to mention \u2018 non-aligned\u2019 or \u2018non-alignment\u2019 even once, and the opposition campaign is marked by Sinophobia. <\/p>\n<p>Readers may recall my stance during the impeachment motion against President Premadasa. It is the same compulsion&#8211; rather than any \u201ccarrots and sticks\u201d&#8211; that make me get off the fence, come out in defense and support of Mahinda Rajapaksa.<\/p>\n<p>I think it has always been fairly evident that I would support an electoral replacement of Mahinda only by Sajith Premadasa, while I would certainly have considered it had Maithripala Sirisena not been willing to abolish the executive presidency, leaving Ranil and Chandrika as the winners. <\/p>\n<p>To conclude on a note that is at one and the same time personal, ideological and conceptual, I regard Mahinda just as I did Premadasa, as a tragic hero scorned by the hypocritical Colombo elite, and my support for Premadasa and Mahinda are in perfect congruence with Rajiva Wijesinha\u2019s recollection of my ideological disposition in our first substantive conversation, at Radhika\u2019s birthday party I believe, exactly three decades ago. In my perspective and Weltanschauung, the central categories have remained the triad \u2018State-Nation-Hero\u2019; a triad with ancient roots in political and philosophical thought as well as literature.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that the political parting of ways between Rajiva and me, just as that between me and erstwhile ideological comrades, among whom are well-regarded commentators with a consistent track record of frontal opposition to Mahinda since his nomination in 2005, is sourced in the following: their perspective is essentially that of civil society and privileges issues of governance, while mine is state-centric or statist, and privileges and operates on the axis of the dialectic of the State and the individual (tragic) hero.<\/p>\n<p>As a product of a Catholic school and having been mentored by an Italian Jesuit and historian Fr. Vito Perniola (my late mother Lakshmi\u2019s spiritual advisor) my attitude to the Maithri-CBK-Ranil revolt is that of Ignatius Loyola towards the Protestant Reformation. I\u2019ll remain loyal to the Pope and help him with a strong intervention in the \u2018battle of ideas\u2019.   <\/p>\n<div id=\"tweetbutton36718\" class=\"tw_button\" style=\"float:right;margin-left:10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdbsjeyaraj.com%2Fdbsj%2F%3Fp%3D36718&amp;text=%26%238220%3BI%20Regard%20Mahinda%20Rajapaksa%20as%20a%20Tragic%20Anti-Hero%20Scorned%20by%20the%20Hypocritical%20Colombo%20Elite%26%238221%3B&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal\" class=\"twitter-share-button\"  style=\"width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-tweet-button\/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By DR DAYAN JAYATILLEKA As a consistent supporter of the tragic hero and the anti-hero, and as a Lankan, in the battle between Rama and Ravana, I support and defend Ravana. I\u2019m on Ravana\u2019s side; never Vibheenshana\u2019s. That is why I supported Premadasa and that\u2019s why I support Mahinda. As my dear friend Rajiva Wijesinha &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/?p=36718\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading &lsquo;&#8220;I Regard Mahinda Rajapaksa as a Tragic Anti-Hero Scorned by the Hypocritical Colombo Elite&#8221;&rsquo; &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36718"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=36718"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36718\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36730,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36718\/revisions\/36730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=36718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=36718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dbsjeyaraj.com\/dbsj\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=36718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}