Dr. Vinoth Ramachandra
In the few days following the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) meetings in Geneva, we have witnessed several acts of blatant criminality by mobs on people and property – in Colombo, Killinochchi and elsewhere.
A common factor has been the passivity of the police. They have looked the other way (reminiscent of July ’83) and suppressed video evidence of the culprits responsible for such violence.
We have also witnessed, in a single day, the Attorney General interfering in court cases involving family members and friends of politicians.
The justifiable outrage over groups like Bodhu Bala Sena (BBS) must not distract us from asking fundamental questions such as:
(1) Whom do the police come under, and who has the power to silence them?
(2) Who has the power to use the Attorney General to overturn due process and the rule of law?
(3) Why does the BBS only protest about animal slaughter and not about anti- Buddhist practices like casinos and the money-laundering, prostitution and human trafficking that always comes with casinos? Could this be a clue as to who is actually behind them?
The public must keep raising these questions – in the independent media, schools and universities, civil society associations, and – above all – in Parliament through their elected representatives.
The public must also draw the obvious connections between these recent acts of violence and what was debated in Geneva. The rule of law has collapsed in Sri Lanka. So we can never expect any impartial investigation into human rights abuses and war crimes. When even the Chairman of the local Human Rights Commission protests that the UNHRC Resolution violates ‘national sovereignty’, he shows his ignorance of the idea of human rights. How did such a man ever get into such a position?
Ever since the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials that followed the Second World war, international law has recognized that the plea “I was just following orders” does not protect policemen, civil servants or soldiers from prosecution. They are culpable, along with those politicians and army commanders who issued the orders.
The public must also draw the obvious connections between recent controversial parliamentary resolutions and the rampant lawlessness witnessed today. All those who supported the 18th Amendment, which handed absolute power into the hands of one man, share in the culpable inaction of the police and will be judged one day for their folly.